My counter to that statement is that [[as I've said before) the one-size-fits all approach of closing down whole states is having a huge impact on the US economy. I would not have chosen that option.
But there was a reason beyond speculation for some form of response not against an 'IF' but an actual/ active virus: COVID-19, Corornavirus. Too many have died in a compressed span of time for such an abstraction of 'IF'.
The Either this OR THAT narrative too often negates of the reality of one thing subordinate to the other.
The BOTH/ AND is were reason [[and a solution) can be found:
1. Focusing on the United States [[not the global impact of COVID-19) we have experienced a serious pandemic with a high infection and death rate beyond the common flu within the time frame of its arrival to the US.
AND
2. We have a one-size-fit all approach [[as per governor options etc) to said pandemic arguably not respective of lower infection rates in some areas which is starting to render a full collapse of the US economy. Especially with regards to small businesses the longer the shut down continues...
BOTH of these issues are realities.
NOW we must find a balanced way to re-open segments of our business, schools and commerce etc, in a manner that is both realistic and outcome measurable re. the the virus status, transmission and the US economy.
Bookmarks