Isn't it amazing that development seems to occur when conditions are 'right'.
I really doubt GM's 'grand design' was a bunch of surface parking lots.
An optimist sees a surface parking lot as a potential building [[or at worse a parking garage). And it is easier to develop a surface parking lot than a bad building and certainly some industrial site.
Who wants to bet that in say 10 years that 1/2 of the surface parking lot spaces [[in downtown from the river to say those parking spaces at the arena site) will be gone?
Bookmarks