I remain quite confused by this claim of state whim. What does it matter whether its taxpayer dollars or not. This has nothing to do with whether the city has financial problems and will run out of cash. If the city has problems getting cash from bonds tied in with the state, or from any other bond market, why is not an alarm bell?
Still seems to me this is just part of a campaign to divert attention from the real problem [[city insolvency) to another [[they're out to get us by withholding our money).
Nice politics, but sideshow.
Bookmarks