Setting aside the sports thing for a moment........
I don't really get the reasoning behind washrooms being sorted by sex in the first place.
In your home, presumably, mom, dad, brother, sister, husband/wife all use the same facilities.
Its easy enough to address privacy concerns by extending stall to the floor and having the come close enough to the ceiling that no one is poking their head or cell phone over for a peek.
People can wash their hands at the same sink fear of violence or moral calamity.
Its much more efficient to run unisex washrooms, that way you don't have complaints in workplaces or concert/sports venues when crowds skew towards one sex vs the other.
***
I should add, Toronto is inching in this direction, as of now, all new community recreation centres in Toronto have universal change rooms. [[no not showers); but changing areas are private for each person, and you're expected to be clothed/swimsuit in any common areas.
***
In respect of sports the difference in physical ability as it relates to higher muscle mass of males in particular [[along w/size/reach etc.0 is the reason for making the sexual distinction in sport.
Not all sports make meaningful distinctions.
[[Boxing/Wrestling use weight classes, but track and field makes no differentiation based on height/leg length)
That said, in general, where distinctions on sex are removed, it will severely limit female participation at the top levels.
I think how you address this is predicated on what you believe high-performance sport is about.
If its about encouraging participation and promoting physical fitness, there should be more distinctions [[weight class, height etc.) rather than fewer.
If its only about Higher, Stronger, Faster for humanity, then remove all the barriers and the consequence be damned.
I have an open mind on the subject, but expect most would prefer to maintain or increase distinctions rather than abolish them.
Bookmarks