Wait no more!
Here's you tool!!
WANT!!
Wait no more!
Here's you tool!!
WANT!!
It's a cool toy, but limited by the distance a wi-fi signal can reach, and penetrate building walls. More useful for the intent the creators intended, as an augmented gaming device.
I think that might still be trespassing. Legal expert?
I had a similar toy only much cheaper [[$20?) from American Science and Surplus. I doubt they still sell it. It was just a couple of remotely-controlled fans stuck to the bottom of a large helium party balloon. No camera though. You could make it climb, descend, turn, twirl. Great fun. Cats are fascinated by it.
http://www.parrot.com/
The answer JL, is that it all depends. It would likely be trespassing if the drone flies over private property in such a manner to be obtrusive [[like photographing thru a window). Courts have upheld police surveillance, however, from flying over and seeing pot growing, or using heat monitors from the street to see if someone is using substantial heat lighting [[which led to search warrants).
Several celebs complained to Google about street maps and close up satellite views of their properties. I don't recall any litigation because Google agreed to eliminate the views.
That takes the fun out of it. Plus it looks expensive.
Birdshot might remove the annoyance for those of us living outside of city limits.
Not related, but the video seems to have been filmed in France.
|
Bookmarks