My guess is that the Granderson deal was not about salary so much as getting maximum return. Granderson has had problems hitting left handed for a while, especially last year. As a leadoff hitter, his average was unacceptable. I think Dombrowski & Co. thought that these problems might be persistent. He also knew Granderson still had a high reputation [[ie high return in trade value) but that another 'off' year would lower his value much lower than what it is now. He basically saw it as "Granderson had an off year but teams are willing to pay above market value given his performance" and jumped on the deal. The closest equivilent I can come up with is when he traded Jeff Weaver, whose numbers weren't great but had a high value, and got Bonderman, Pena, and Rodney in return. If he would have waited even another year, Weaver would have gotten much less in return.
The Valvedre signing puzzled me but it's making a little more sense. If they manage to compete, they look good. If they struggle, they can simply trade him mid-year and probably get a good return since closers are always in demand. Plus, depending on how things are going, the closers-in-waiting [[Zumaya, Perry, new young guys) could be trade bait to fill in holes if they're in a tight race as long as they stay healthy and perform.
I'm not sure about Damon. I wouldn't mind a two year deal at no more than $6m per year, but anything more than that and they're either committing too long or paying too much. Bringing in a veteran slugger looked pretty good when they signed Gary Sheffield, too, and that couldn't have turned out worse.
They have a lot of junk money coming off the books after this year. One thing to watch is whether Maggs hits his 540 at bats or whatever it is needed to trigger his 2011 option for $18mil. I firmly believe that there is NO, NO, NO way this should be allowed to happen.
Bookmarks