Took less than 3 seconds using Duck Duck Go:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/natalie.../#751565d1121f
Plus a number of other sites including Slate, several 'christian news sites' and FAUX Snooze.
Took less than 3 seconds using Duck Duck Go:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/natalie.../#751565d1121f
Plus a number of other sites including Slate, several 'christian news sites' and FAUX Snooze.
But the Forbes article only refers to what was said in the other "news" articles; it didn't do its own investigative reporting. I found the same type of reporting in the Washington Post, but no reputable source that actually did interviews, etc. It's sad when Forbe's and WP rely on gossip rags for their news.
Took less than 3 seconds using Duck Duck Go:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/natalie.../#751565d1121f
Plus a number of other sites including Slate, several 'christian news sites' and FAUX Snooze.
|
Bookmarks