Michigan Central Restored and Opening
RESTORED MICHIGAN CENTRAL DEPOT OPENS »



Results 1 to 25 of 48

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,501

    Default

    BTW, if anyone doesn't appreciate what the effect of small families have had on population, look at Dearborn, what was [[is?) a rock solid suburb:

    Significant population losses in the 60s, 70, and 80s and now at 1970s population levels...

    If my math is correct, from 4/1/1960 to 4/1/1990, Dearborn lost about 20% [[89K/ 112K).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dearborn,_Michigan
    Last edited by emu steve; June-01-15 at 09:55 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by emu steve View Post
    BTW, if anyone doesn't appreciate what the effect of small families have had on population, look at Dearborn, what was [[is?) a rock solid suburb:

    Significant population losses in the 60s, 70, and 80s and now at 1970s population levels...

    If my math is correct, from 4/1/1960 to 4/1/1990, Dearborn lost about 20% [[89K/ 112K).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dearborn,_Michigan
    Smaller household sizes aren't really relevant to a discussion of inner-city population loss. Cities have always had smaller household sizes throughout the world, and the issues specifically facing Detroit are related to fundamental lack of demand, not changes to household structure.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bham1982 View Post
    Smaller household sizes aren't really relevant to a discussion of inner-city population loss. Cities have always had smaller household sizes throughout the world, and the issues specifically facing Detroit are related to fundamental lack of demand, not changes to household structure.
    I understand the point you are making, but any MCD, e.g., Detroit or an older suburb will experience [[or will have experienced) population loss even if number of housing units remain constant.

    So Dearborn might have lost 20% [[since 1960). Detroit lost say over 50% [[since 1960).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by emu steve View Post
    I understand the point you are making, but any MCD, e.g., Detroit or an older suburb will experience [[or will have experienced) population loss even if number of housing units remain constant.

    So Dearborn might have lost 20% [[since 1960). Detroit lost say over 50% [[since 1960).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit
    Smaller household sizes aren't relevant to the Detroit discussion because Detroit's actual household count has declined dramatically [[hence all of the abandoned houses).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.