Do you have any citation of Pugh making that statement?
Do you have any citation of Pugh making that statement?
Here is the link to that episode of Let It Rip. http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/dpp/news/let-it-rip-091112
There is no mention of Gary Brown returning any money to the City. What was talked about at the very end of the episode was the possibility of Michael Stefani having to pay a judgment against him for violating the confidentiality agreement. That money would go to the City. This is why you should cite the statements you claim are being made so we can check the veracity of what is claimed.
Last edited by eno; November-15-09 at 01:19 AM.
Let us put on our thinking caps; what affect Stefani affects Gary BrownHere is the link to that episode of Let It Rip. http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/dpp/news/let-it-rip-091112
There is no mention of Gary Brown returning any money to the City. What was talked about at the very end of the episode was the possibility of Michael Stefani having to pay a judgment against him for violating the confidentiality agreement. That money would go to the City. This is why you should cite the statements you claim are being made so we can check the veracity of what is claimed.
So you'll admit that there was no mention of Gary Brown by Charles Pugh in the Let It Rip episode you claimed.
There is no connection between Gary Brown and Mike Stefani in the confidentiality agreement lawsuit brought by Kwame.
Whatever affects Stefani has no bearing on Browns lawsuit award. It's been done, it's over with. While they are investigating Stefani, seems to me they should be going after thug KK's lawyers, City attorneys and anyone else who blatently lied while under oath during the lawsuit.
|
Bookmarks