Michigan Central Restored and Opening
RESTORED MICHIGAN CENTRAL DEPOT OPENS »



Results 1 to 25 of 31

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 313WX View Post
    To add to your statement, what the Federal Government said specifically is that they wouldn't fund the construction of a light rail project in Detroit without the city & region having a dedicated revenue source to support its operation [[I.E. a millage).

    They told us the exact same thing when we were fighting over the same crap back in the 70s / 80s and ended up with the People Mover.

    That was the whole purpose of establishing the RTA and putting this initiative on the ballot in the last election.
    "[[I.E. a millage)" huh what? Nowhere anywhere do the Feds require a millage to contribute towards a public transport system.

    That is NOT how the large majority of public transportation systems in the United States of America are funded on the local level.

    https://www.thoughtco.com/basics-of-...unding-2798674

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ABetterDetroit View Post
    "[[I.E. a millage)" huh what? Nowhere anywhere do the Feds require a millage to contribute towards a public transport system.

    That is NOT how the large majority of public transportation systems in the United States of America are funded on the local level.

    https://www.thoughtco.com/basics-of-...unding-2798674
    It was simply an example of a dedicated revenue source. I don't care how transit is funded elsewhere, but merely how it would have been funded here. BTW, had the initiative in the last election passed, it would have generated around $3 billion over a 20-year period to only be used for transit.

    The articles are below. And to remind you, the *ONLY* reason the Q-Line received federal funding is because Dan Gilbert / Roger Penske agreed to subsidize its operations with their own dollars.

    http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article...days-to-answer

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1679823.html

    http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/...l_results.html
    Last edited by 313WX; May-18-17 at 01:16 AM.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 313WX View Post
    It was simply an example of a dedicated revenue source. I don't care how transit is funded elsewhere, but merely how it would have been funded here. BTW, had the initiative in the last election passed, it would have generated around $3 billion over a 20-year period to only be used for transit.

    The articles are below. And to remind you, the *ONLY* reason the Q-Line received federal funding is because Dan Gilbert / Roger Penske agreed to subsidize its operations with their own dollars.

    http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article...days-to-answer

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1679823.html

    http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/...l_results.html
    I know it's a Michigan thing.

    Ignoring and not caring what is working good elsewhere then dream up some Fucked up way of doing something then when that fails do nothing.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.