Mouron's pick parking lot dispute with Green Dot Stables

[Wesley Mouch]

Green Dot has a pretty strong argument for adverse possession, since DIBC hasn't touched that piece of land it what sounds like decades, and Green Dot has made improvements to it.

Jon, thanks for clarifying that its not eminent domain, but adverse possession.

Hope a lawyer here can clarify this. I thought it was 7 years of possession without an assertion of ownership by the owner of record. But maybe different now or than I thought.

And I'll pile onto the 'sided' discussion too. Courts do not 'side' with anyone. Courts decide the application of law. I assume the courts 'decision' on this is only that they don't know enough yet to stop DIBC from asserting their claim, so they've said its legal for DIBC to be making the claim until proven otherwise. A ruling of the law as regards 'adverse possession' requires more legal proof.