C.V. wrote
Had he been limited to a 10-round magazine, one would reasonable infer a pro-rated reduction in people shot and killed; meaning six more people would still be alive.
Can you please show the facts of how you arrived at that conclusion?
Or was that your personal opinion presented as a fact?
I will help you,it takes 2 to 3 seconds to replace a magazine,so a 100 round magazine verses a 30 round magazine verses a 15 round magazine has no relevance.
You really need to learn about weapons before commenting on how they should function.
What saved lives was the rapid response from the police with guns,if somebody in the crowd had been carrying more lives could have also possibility been saved.
Why did the guy shoot his sister,he knew who she was ?
Is it normal to shoot your own family members?
Bookmarks