Much worse than Flint. In retrospect, the Flint problem was obvious -- but at the time is to likely hard to see. Water quality is hard to measure.
But unemployment insurance? Seems easy by comparison. A review of any case should have been all the sunlight needed. That it didn't happen is an indictment of either individuals, or the system.
So tell me. Why do we assume that monopoly public schools are necessarily any better. We get crap results -- but instead of encouraging more entrants [[charters), we somehow think more money is the solution. Was the solution to put more money into the unemployment review system?
Bookmarks