Shouldn't we "wait until all the facts are in" and not "rush to judgment?" Isn't it "too soon after the attack to start talking about policy changes?" Because that was the default response after the Las Vegas attack. What's different about the man who committed this attack compared to the man who committed the Las Vegas massacre that we would react so differently to the attack?

Shouldn't you guys just be offering up some lip-service platitudes like "thoughts and prayers to the victims" and not politicize this tragedy? Or do we only do that in certain terrorist incidents when the attacker is of a certain skin hue?