In fairness, it isn't the developer's fault the brownfield site is polluted. Somebody has to pay to clean up the mess, and good luck getting the actual polluter to pay up.
Second, if the redevelopment doesn't happen, then the tax dollars never materialize anyway. So it isn't like somebody is losing out on tax dollars.
This is why I am okay with it, as long as there is a time cap in place. The developer recoups their brownfield cost, and after 20 years the city/state can cash in on the tax generated by the project that wouldn't have otherwise happened.
Bookmarks