Legit concerns by the residents no doubt. But isn't it well documented that the ferry owner has told the city counsel and residents that he wants to retire and the ferry service will cease?
And although there are legit concerns presented by the residents who oppose the bridge, the justification that it going to destroy a neighborhood seems to be a stretch. According to the proposal, the bridge would run between two undeveloped plots of land. So I don't see how it's destroying that area.
Bookmarks