It's ironic you say that because the whole problem with your argument is you take Jeannine Pirro's opinions as fact. She presents them as facts; she's nothing if not bluster. But that doesn't make them facts. She has a proven proclivity to misrepresent facts. Don't be fooled.
See if you can back up her "facts" with a reputable source. It doesn't have to be a "liberal" one. It can be the Wall Street Journal, which like Fox is owned by Murdoch. Just don't take them from their opinion page. Especially not their op-ed page. By definition those are opinions, not facts.
There is no point discussing this with someone who doesn't understand the difference. I have the humility to admit when I don't have enough facts to formulate an opinion I can back up. And I don't have enough facts to debate your opinions. Neither do you.
Besides that it's no one else's job to do your research. We've been trying to point you in the right direction. Or at least to point you away from the wrong one where you've been. The rest is up to you. Until then, try some humility too.
Bookmarks