Long before I knew who Rand was, in my teens, I developed my perception of religion as an ancient manmade system of controlling the masses and allow for a civil society at that time. Since it is the foundation of modern society, there is much in religion to respect and value, but a great deal that is frankly wrong [[the collectivist bits for none thing). I differ from Rand in that she completely dismisses religion as evil, I see it as an ancient philosophy with some strengths and weaknesses. She is completely atheistic, where I look at G-d as a word describing existance as a whole, and therefore, by that definition and by logic it/G-d must exist. Rand herself has repeatedly expressed that the core of metaphysics is that existants [[or existence) exists. By my definition, she would have to agree that G-d exists.
Her arguments against blind faith in religion, collectivism, and mysticism are absolutely and irrefutably correct by rational analysis.
Bookmarks