No fun at all. And let me take a second to say that even though I found the NAACP guy to be a fool who is harming African-Americans -- he does have some valid points. I struggle as well with the issue here. I like bankruptcy precisely because it is dispassionate. City acts like fool. Citizens pay the price -- no matter what that is. If you want to pay a living wage, you have to live within your means. And we haven't. But this is somehow different, says my lily-white self. Art ownership by the DIA seems like a public trust. Its like the ground. It is part of what a city is. Its not chattel that has monetary value. But if I believe that, does that mean that others can make the same claims? Can the Charles Wright museum say that their contents and their building [[and their payroll) are also 'public trust'. What about Hart Plaza? Where does one stop?
In the meantime, I think the NAACP is onto something. This selling art is a conspiracy against the Hispanics. Banksy was small change. Rivera is the man.
Bookmarks