Quote Originally Posted by dmike76 View Post
EFM! Oh wait....prop 1 was foolishly voted down.
You're confused.

According to your Attorney General, since PA4 [[the EM law) was repealed on election day, PA72 [[the EFM law) is still in effect, even though it was repealed.

The EM had the sweeping powers to toss out elected officials, impose contracts and sell off assets. The EFM strictly deals with the finances. All EMs, according to your Attorney General, simply reverted back to EFMs.

But there will be litigation over the resurrection of PA72, despite the fact that it was repealed, after Thanksgiving. If the courts agree that PA72 can't be resurrected because it was repealed even though PA4 was repealed, then essentially the state legislator will have to come up with a new law while the current EFMs will pack their bags and ride off into the sunset.

Also, according to Bing, over a dozen lawsuits have been filed against the Consent Agreement. So there's that as well.