you're asking a hypothetical question and extrapolating from limited information. I say you're either for freedom of choice or not. The central question is whether laws are designed to maintain the status quo and support the control of the majority or laws are designed to protect the rights of the minority.

Sticky stuff this business. It's difficult to be for minority rights, except when someone's world-view is directly in oppostion to the majority.

Don't mean to be confrontational, but I've found in conversations with feminists, that plural marriage is a deal breaker, but gay marriage is not. I've also found that being sensitive to the various sexual orientations seems to come to a halt when plural marriage is introduced to the discussion. I don't know why that is, why being liberal is demanded on one hand but squashed on the other.

Freaky.