Michigan Central Restored and Opening
RESTORED MICHIGAN CENTRAL DEPOT OPENS »



Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 166
  1. #126
    Lorax Guest

    Default

    Happily I will. Will be great seeing additional losses on the fascist right.

    I hope Saracuda Failin' runs again, perhaps she and Brush Lintball can team up, we can label them the Hockey Marm and the Caftan Warlord.

  2. #127
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    No, they don't have a fillibuster proof majority [[which, trust me, you should thank G-d they don't). Let's revisit your predictions when the time comes Jaberwocky. Even you will be singing a different tune as the progressive worsening and painful damage is done by Obama.

  3. #128
    Lorax Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ccbatson View Post
    One ancient relic, no current neanderthals of that mind set on the right. Loads of them on the left.
    Ancient relic?

    Are we referring to your ideas, or your wardrobe? Both?

    Neanderthals, now that's an interesting one to run with....

    Repugnican Knuckledraggers aka Neanderthalis Modernistas:

    Knute GinGrinch
    Saracuda Failin'
    Michael Steele
    Glenda Speck
    Brush Lintball
    Sean Manatee
    Mann Coultergeist
    Bill Kristolmeth
    Richard Piggery
    John Boner
    Jeff N. Sessions [[the 'N' stands for Needsafew)
    ScEric Cantor
    Bill Orally

    Why are all of these people so utterly awful?

    You guys must be longing for Nixon right about now.

  4. #129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lorax View Post
    You guys must be longing for Nixon right about now.
    Actually, the current crop of goons make Nixon look tame, almost saintlike by comparison.

  5. #130
    Lorax Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Detroitej72 View Post
    Actually, the current crop of goons make Nixon look tame, almost saintlike by comparison.
    My point exactly!

  6. #131

    Default

    Rush Linbaugh is still probably angry from the last year election when his old friend Dick Cheney and Joe Six Pack lose that is taking out of the Neo-Cons. That really fuel the downfall of the Republican Party leading to the rise of Democratic Socialist Party in the United States.

  7. #132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FreeofAletall View Post
    Uh yes. The Democratic Party proudly brought you slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow, Lynchings, Segregation etc. etc. etc.

    Meanwhile Republicans brought you freedom, prosperity and worked on equality for all..
    and then, after the last REAL republican [[TR) the two parties switched [[except in the south, where they are always slow to change)

  8. #133
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    I am really starting to like this FreeofAletall guy.

  9. #134
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Jaberwocky is it now? Crawled out of your hole for a moment did you?

  10. #135
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    I am...are you?

  11. #136
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Ignorance is bliss...while it lasts....enjoy.

  12. #137
    Lorax Guest

    Default

    Returning to the title of this thread, I feel we need to take a deep breath and enjoy the beauty of Limbaugh being called a Nazi.

    There is such purity and beauty in seeing the brilliant truth.

  13. #138
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Yet you still try, don't you Jaberwocky? It isn't a matter of a lack of desire, it is a matter of lack of ability on your part.

  14. #139
    Lorax Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ccbatson View Post
    I am really starting to like this FreeofAletall guy.
    Perhaps you two can get your picture taken together.

  15. #140
    Lorax Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FreeofAletall View Post
    Uh yes. The Democratic Party proudly brought you slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow, Lynchings, Segregation etc. etc. etc.

    Meanwhile Republicans brought you freedom, prosperity and worked on equality for all.

    It wasn't until democrats figured out they could not win anymore that they, the Socialists and communists[[i.e. Liberals) all joined forces to overthrow the good republicans have been doing in this country since the inception of the party.

    It was a smart coup actually. All they did was beat republicans to the punch by a small margin.

    Now with the propaganda wing [[i.e. media,and educators,) of their party working overtime in the brainwashing dept. they have managed to project onto republicans the very essence of their own vicious historical being via mass media lies. [[i.e. Pravda American style. Mathews,Olberman,Maddow,Sanchez,Sharpton,Jackson,e tc.)


    Communism might just win after all. But how long do you think it will last before people tire of your stomping all over their rights? Especially the 1st amendment.
    LOL!!!

    Really? Funny how it was Democrats who fought for and ended slavery, the 19th amendment which gave women the right to vote, achieved the voting rights act in 1965, brought us the New Deal, the WPA, the CCC, the Great Society, Social Security, Medicare, and all related reforms which have only added to our progress as a society.

    And Repugnicans fought us all the way.

    And the Repugnican presidents in power at the time were forced through popular Democratic majorities to sign some of this legislation into law!

    How sweet is that irony?

  16. #141
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Which Democrats? Lincoln? Frederick Douglas? MLK? Forget the party label...conservatives to a person.

  17. #142

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ccbatson View Post
    Which Democrats? Lincoln? Frederick Douglas? MLK? Forget the party label...conservatives to a person.

    definitively NOT conservatives by any known definition of the term

  18. #143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ccbatson View Post
    Which Democrats? Lincoln? Frederick Douglas? MLK? Forget the party label...conservatives to a person.
    All of the above mentioned were pretty liberal. Hell, our wonderful FBI thought MLK was such a dangerous liberal that they had quite the file on him.

    John W. Booth was a conservative, and quite angry with that damn liberal Lincoln, and we know what happened there. James Earl Ray was also very much a conservative, and again, look what his actions were.

    Hell, if there was talk radio back then, the ditto heads of the day would have been calling for Lincoln to fail.

  19. #144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HPGrmln View Post
    I never used to be this way. But you get really frustrated and angry after hearing people use the same tired talking points to rip on every single aspect of anyone with philosophical differences. "That guys a conservative, that means he's a bigot and wants everyone to suffer." No conservative can do a single good deed in the minds of all these countless people, who cannot bring themselves to open their minds and admit that their political opposites are not the otherworldy monsters they make themselves to be. Im angry because I live in severley polarized country where too many people think its impossible that any good can come from someone elses side. Im getting angry because people are putting party affiliation before anything else and are blindly loyal to a party that is more flawed than they like to think. Im getting angry because we can't put political signs on our private property without narrow-minded loyalists stealing or even burning them. Im pissed that I had a political bumper sticker on my car supporting the Republican candidate and someone walked onto my private property and pulled it off my personal vehicle in the middle of the night, and far too many people of their mindset publicly condone this. I do not know even one person who tampered with anyones property containing an advertisement for a Democratic candidate. I hear story after story of conservatives being publicly reviled and harrassed, but never liberals or conservatives being harrassed in the same vein.If I sound angry, its because Im tired of the blatant disregard people have for anyone whos views dont fit within their personal narrow mindset and refuse to listen to opposing viewpoints with calm, friendly dialogue, or without violating personal privacy or private property rights.
    I had my bumper sticker riped off from my car in my front yard...who was the candidate's sticker? None other than Barak...and while riping off my bumper sticker was mild...the continous "riping" off Obama lawn signs was an invasionof property rights...isn't that usually a right wing issue [[property rights?).

  20. #145
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Con*serv"a*tive\, n. 1. One who, or that which, preserves from ruin, injury, innovation, or radical change; a preserver; a conserver.

    With the subject of the action to be conserved being liberty.

    Make more sense now?

  21. #146
    Lorax Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ccbatson View Post
    Con*serv"a*tive\, n. 1. One who, or that which, preserves from ruin, injury, innovation, or radical change; a preserver; a conserver.

    With the subject of the action to be conserved being liberty.

    Make more sense now?
    No, not really.

  22. #147
    Lorax Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Detroitej72 View Post
    All of the above mentioned were pretty liberal. Hell, our wonderful FBI thought MLK was such a dangerous liberal that they had quite the file on him.

    John W. Booth was a conservative, and quite angry with that damn liberal Lincoln, and we know what happened there. James Earl Ray was also very much a conservative, and again, look what his actions were.

    Hell, if there was talk radio back then, the ditto heads of the day would have been calling for Lincoln to fail.
    Or labeled James Earl Ray a liberal.

  23. #148

    Default

    Con*serv"a*tive\, n. 1. One who, or that which, preserves from ruin, injury, innovation, or radical change; a preserver; a conserver.
    I'm still waiting for my copy of The Official, but unpublished, Glossary of Batsonia, until then, I'm forced to use standard dictionaries of the English language for definitions.

  24. #149

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ccbatson View Post
    Con*serv"a*tive\, n. 1. One who, or that which, preserves from ruin, injury, innovation, or radical change; a preserver; a conserver.

    With the subject of the action to be conserved being liberty.

    Make more sense now?

    funny. conservatives have always been at the fore in the fight against expanding liberties to those who don't have them. any examination of history will show that to even the most feeble-minded.

    conservative are dedicated to maintaining the status quo, in this case, the priveledge of the economic elites and the ultimate demotion of labor and the middle class to that of drones and indentured servants

  25. #150

    Default

    From Merriam-Webster:

    conservative

    4 entries found.

    1. <LI selected="selected">1conservative [[adjective)
    2. 2conservative [[noun)
    3. Conservative Judaism
    4. Progressive Conservative





    Main Entry: 1con·ser·va·tive Pronunciation: \kən-ˈsər-və-tiv\ Function: adjective Date: 14th century 1: preservative2 a: of or relating to a philosophy of conservatism bcapitalized : of or constituting a political party professing the principles of conservatism: as [[1): of or constituting a party of the United Kingdom advocating support of established institutions [[2): progressive conservative 3 a: tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : traditional b: marked by moderation or caution <a conservative estimate> c: marked by or relating to traditional norms of taste, elegance, style, or manners 4: of, relating to, or practicing Conservative Judaism
    — con·ser·va·tive·ly adverb
    — con·ser·va·tive·ness noun

    conservatism

    One entry found.




    Main Entry: con·ser·va·tism Pronunciation: \kən-ˈsər-və-ˌti-zəm\ Function: noun Date: 1832 1capitalized a: the principles and policies of a Conservative party b: the Conservative party2 a: disposition in politics to preserve what is established b: a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change ; specifically : such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs [[as retirement income or health-care coverage)3: the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.