Quote Originally Posted by bailey View Post
....that was barely maintained when it was occupied and then left to rot when it was finally abandoned by the owners. Per the article, 5 Beekman gave off the appearance of being occupied and likely occupied by the very wealthy. When could any empty property in Detroit say that? That's either a product of responsible owners or a city that would not put up with a blighted property standing open to the elements in a downtown area....either way, if it was in Detroit it'd have met the same fate as the Layfayette
I think we have a winner.

[[But they wouldn't have paid for it to be demolished either.)