Today's freep editorial is a little scary. The editor asserts: "The bridge company, which has done an excellent job of operating the Ambassador, has the capital and expertise to make such a public-private partnership work."

Didn't the Bridge just get a maintenance rating of only "fair to poor"? Has the Bridge ownership ever demonstrated any community support other than the most transparently self-serving and cheap???? Today the Freep is actually editorializing that the DIBC should get a share of the proceeds from any new Bridge and from the Blue Water Bridge. Please explain for what reason except that the freep's new owners and editorial staff is carrying some sort of torch for Moroun.

I hope Walter Lubienski lives forever and ever. he's the old guy who challenged Moroun's "Federal instrumentality" mantra fairy tale and won.