Quote Originally Posted by Ravine View Post
"...He chose not to testify because he had no rebuttal to the evidence brought against him...."

Eno, you don't state that the above comment is only your opinion, but that's what it is, and I don't agree with you. There are a handful of reasons which could explain his not-testifying.
For all we know, he may have been busting to do so. Probably was, actually.
Ravine, you can assume that anything posted on these threads are an opinion of the person authoring them.

You state that there are a handful of reasons to explain Riddle not testifying on his own behalf but you offer not a single one of them. Sam Riddle welcomed his trial to allow him to speak truth to power or he so claimed but the presentation of the overwhelming evidence against him has stunned and silenced him. He has no plausible explanation for the money he collected on Monica Conyers behalf nor the money he was paid via Monica Conyers for him acting as a consultant via the bribed contractors.