"Just trying to get him to admit that somebody's freedom of choice of how to run their private business is being infringed upon, whether we agree with the decision or not."
I'll agree to that as long as you can agree that the freedom of everyone else's right to be free of toxic smoke in a business has been protected. You keep framing the debate as if there's only one side that has rights worth discussing. I would take the position that this law protected more people than it harmed.
Bookmarks