Darwinism and Eric_c, I just want to add some figures to help further the discussion. I am in the process of purchasing a 2010 Ford Fusion Sport. Here are the relevant figures [[rounded to the nearest hundred):
MSRP: $27,400
Invoice: $25,700
A/Z Plan: $24,800
The dealer sells the car to me below invoice and is reimbursed by Ford for the difference b/w invoice and the A/Z plan price. In addition to being reimbursed, the dealer gets some amount [[~$800) for selling the vehicle at the A/Z plan price. This is its profit on the A/Z plan sale. Therefore, the dealer still gets something like $800 above invoice for the car. The $1,700 difference between the MSRP and Invoice is the maximum dealer profit. As a consumer, it is up to you to squeeze that $900 out of the dealer [[$1,700 max. profit - $800 A/Z plan profit) by having them reduce the MSRP by $900 or as close to $26,500 as possible.
In my opinion, I don't think these figures are that unreasonable. As shown above, the A/Z plan price is only $900 or 3.5% below invoice and $1,700 or 6.5% below the $26,500 savvy consumer price. Even if you look at the difference between the MSRP and the A/Z plan price, it's less than 10%.
Both of my wife's grandfathers busted their asses for 35 years at Ford. Like I said before, they are extremely proud that their grandaughter is eligible for a discount when she purchases Ford vehicles. Although Ford has not taken taxpayer money yet, even if it had, I think that continuing the employee discount would not necessarily be a disservice to taxpayers. Ford gets a lot of indirect benefit from having its employees and their families drive the same vehicles that they assemble, market, and sell to the public.
Bookmarks