Those are federal tax dollars aren't they? All I mean is it isn't part of the general fund, which is what we were specifically discussing.
But I understand and appreciate your logic. If there is funding that is going somewhere that could come to the City instead, to do the same work that the City or some other agency is already doing, then that could be considered additional revenue that would offset costs.
Although I note that P&DD appears to already get more revenue than it costs, at least according to the budget. And I seem to recall that block grant money has stipulations about how it can be spent. So, the City would have to find legitimate ways to use the money to offset costs maybe in agencies like DPW or environmental affairs. I'm not sure exactly how all of that works. But I think I get your point.
Bookmarks