Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 83
  1. #26

    Default

    Remove I-375. Remove the Lodge south of I-94. Cap I-75 for a few blocks to better connect downtown and the mid-city area. Divert through traffic around Detroit. Seem to be good suggestions.

  2. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by muskie1 View Post
    The dowtown freeways could never be covered without having bypass routes to handle all the truck traffic. Most tunnels and covered roads do not allow many hazardous and flammable cargos. Many of the more dangerous loads are confined to having to stay on certain routes so you would need a way for this stuff to move into,through or around the city.
    They probably shouldn't be allowing hazardous and flammable material through downtown anyway. Anyone remember when that truck crashed on the Fisher to Chrysler interchange and melted the overpass? Happened the same year that Comerica Park opened...

  3. #28

    Default

    It just happens to be the freeway that least impacts me.... I don't see any of them disappearing anytime soon...

    As for wonderful neighborhoods dying... I doubt that any neighborhoods died building I-94. They did it in such a way that it didn't cut the huge swaths that the Jeffries took out. And it was done in a way that didn't destroy the Harper Ave. retail district [[that however is happeningly slowly ever since without the freeway's impact)...

  4. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
    They probably shouldn't be allowing hazardous and flammable material through downtown anyway. Anyone remember when that truck crashed on the Fisher to Chrysler interchange and melted the overpass? Happened the same year that Comerica Park opened...
    What are you talking about??? Everyone KNOWS that fire isn't hot enough to melt steel!

    Oh wait...that's another thread.

  5. #30
    Augustiner Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gistok View Post
    And it was done in a way that didn't destroy the Harper Ave. retail district [[that however is happeningly slowly ever since without the freeway's impact)...
    I would be surprised if the two were entirely unrelated. If you build an expressway right behind a retail district [[that is to say, between the retail district and its prospective customers on the adjoining residential streets), decline would seem to be a fairly natural and obvious result.

  6. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DetroitPlanner View Post
    375 is the only freeway to be built with europave. The cost to rip that out would be outragous.
    Wrong section. The Euro-spec section is NB I-75 from I-375 to ~the Warren ramp.

  7. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DC48080 View Post
    And for the other rank and file employees in the Ren Cen to get to their homes in Northwest Detroit, Warren, Dearborn, and any other neighborhood or suburb.

    Don't try to make this thread about putting down the evil unsustainable suburbs or those God awful evil rich executives who live there.
    DC -- my comment wasn't about putting down the evil suburbs or the evil rich executives. It was the truth:

    In July 2000, the Michigan DOT proposed a three-block extension of I-375, moving its terminus further south. This would better serve the waterfront area, including the Renaissance Center [[GM headquarters)

  8. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RO_Resident View Post
    Wrong section. The Euro-spec section is NB I-75 from I-375 to ~the Warren ramp.
    Slaps his head and says: "Doop!"

  9. #34

    Default



    "No, shut them all down!"

  10. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Augustiner View Post
    I would be surprised if the two were entirely unrelated. If you build an expressway right behind a retail district [[that is to say, between the retail district and its prospective customers on the adjoining residential streets), decline would seem to be a fairly natural and obvious result.
    Augustiner.... I moved to the area near Harper & Morang back in 1960... and Harper was a thriving commercial district for decades. Of all the Detroit freeway expansions the Harper/I-94 was likely the most successful [[unlike the Jeffries)... and 40 years later the commercial strip and neighborhood finally started being hurt by urban blight, not the freeway. Perhaps the large number of roads and pedestrian bridges that cross I-94 along the Harper route help as well... and making Harper's commercial route similar to a service drive along much of the meandering east side route, actually helped instead of hurt that stretch.
    Last edited by Gistok; January-14-11 at 04:51 PM.

  11. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gistok View Post
    It just happens to be the freeway that least impacts me.... I don't see any of them disappearing anytime soon...

    As for wonderful neighborhoods dying... I doubt that any neighborhoods died building I-94. They did it in such a way that it didn't cut the huge swaths that the Jeffries took out. And it was done in a way that didn't destroy the Harper Ave. retail district [[that however is happeningly slowly ever since without the freeway's impact)...
    A couple of years ago someone on here posted a before and after of the I-94 and Lodge interchange. The interchange alone looked like it wiped out nearly a square mile of previously development land...

  12. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
    A couple of years ago someone on here posted a before and after of the I-94 and Lodge interchange. The interchange alone looked like it wiped out nearly a square mile of previously development land...
    Yeah, probably about four or five blocks were ripped out to make that interchange, and old-fashioned "diagonal" that is actually pretty economical as a footprint. It was crowded with houses. They must have ripped out scores of homes to build that thing.

  13. #38

    Default

    The average simple cloverleaf intersection covers about 40 acres.

  14. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by missn View Post
    The average simple cloverleaf intersection covers about 40 acres.
    Cloverleaf doesn't work to well for two interstates. There is too much "weaving" between the entering and exiting traffic on all four corners.

    Lodge-Ford tried to eliminate this with the left exits for left turning traffic. That introduces its own weaving problems.

    Ford-Chrysler, while far more expensive and complicated, is built as a "pinwheel" intersection to eliminate weaving.

  15. #40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Detroitnerd View Post
    Yeah, probably about four or five blocks were ripped out to make that interchange, and old-fashioned "diagonal" that is actually pretty economical as a footprint. It was crowded with houses. They must have ripped out scores of homes to build that thing.
    Detroit's problem today is caused by a "shortage of homes"???

  16. #41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hermod View Post
    Detroit's problem today is caused by a "shortage of homes"???
    You amuse me, Hermod. I don't have a total lock on what has caused Detroit's problems today. But, yeah, maybe it wasn't such a hot idea to rip down thousands of homes, hundreds of businesses, scores of apartment buildings and dozens of industrial facilities to build a car-only system of transportation. Just sayin'.

  17. #42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
    I'd get rid of 375 completely. I'd also get rid of the Fisher between I-96 and the 375/75/Gratiot interchange.
    Mine as well take 75 out all the way up to 94.

  18. #43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
    They probably shouldn't be allowing hazardous and flammable material through downtown anyway. Anyone remember when that truck crashed on the Fisher to Chrysler interchange and melted the overpass? Happened the same year that Comerica Park opened...
    I remember a fuel fire at 94 and 75 about 15 years ago, I had to go downtown for an appointment three days later and could still smell the fuel. The blackened bridge was there for years after this happened.

  19. #44

    Default

    In lieu of removing freeways, how about addressing the urban connectivity problems they have already created and prioritize transit funding?

  20. #45

    Default

    Detroit will probably have to begin shrinking its freeway and main throughfares [[at least the inner city ones) if our population decline doesn't ease. Our roads simply don't have the same traffic volume they did in the 1950s - 1970s.

    We've already shrunk Van Dyke & Gratiot about one lane. Then of course Livernois was shrunk about one lane when the median was placed.
    Last edited by 313WX; January-16-11 at 01:51 PM.

  21. #46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gistok View Post
    It just happens to be the freeway that least impacts me.... I don't see any of them disappearing anytime soon...

    As for wonderful neighborhoods dying... I doubt that any neighborhoods died building I-94. They did it in such a way that it didn't cut the huge swaths that the Jeffries took out. And it was done in a way that didn't destroy the Harper Ave. retail district [[that however is happeningly slowly ever since without the freeway's impact)...
    My father once told me that the Links of Chandler were shortened due to the creation of I-94. They're short enough now imo.

    Also, my mom used to do business over there with an upholstery shop on Harper near Connor/Chalmers. Not sure if it's still there, but she always said they did a tremendous job. It's a lost art really.

  22. #47

    Default

    They could get rid of the Southfield Freeway and it wouldn't bother me a bit. Never did like that ride.

  23. #48
    NorthEndere Guest

  24. #49

    Default

    Growing up around here I never really travelled the Lodge. Took Grand River downtown.As a driving adult I never had really a reason too either.

  25. #50

    Default

    I realize that this is off topic, but we've pretty much covered the never-gonna-happen freway removal ideas....

    Have any of you ever driven along the mile roads in either Warren and Sterling Heights, and seen the HUGE empty swaths of land between Schoenherr and Hoover Avenues, that contain the large power grid high rise electrical antennas?? That always seemed like a vast waste of space that would be wide enough to put a freeway into [[plus service drives) without tearing down a single building!!

    Had they ever needed a freeway in the area, that space would have been ideal [[sans the power grid, of course).... with no population loss to either city.

    Are there other areas in metro Detroit that have this much wasted space taken up by the utility grid??

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.