Perhaps St. Peter's could take a cue from the Franciscans on Washington Boulevard - they manage to serve the poor and actually do some vocational work without riling up everyone in the neighborhood.
By contrast, it doesn't sound like St. Peter's has really progressed in this regard in the 20 years since I volunteered there. People were relieving themselves in the area around the church, regardless of the weather, back then too. When things closed down for the day, you could also watch them in the gravel lot making themselves doggy bags of food that they removed from the dining area, for consumption [[and presumably elimination) offsite. When Jeff DeBruyn [[a person helping run Manna) acknowledges that Manna clients are defecating everywhere [[Detroit News, 1/3/2011), the problem is pretty bad. You can't take on the sterile and glamorous [[palatable?) job of making trays of sandwiches and vats of soup and then externalize the consequences onto the neighborhood. It's almost pharasaic.
Violence against the homeless in inexcusable, but I would lay much of Corktown's simmering resentment of homeless people at the feet of the people who - however well intentioned - manage to alienate the middle class from the homeless. And that works two ways: failing to effectively advocate charity to the middle class and exposing it to homeless people in a way that permanently turns it off to the ideas of "restorative justice." This, I think, is a far greater disservice than passivity, because it destroys future opportunities as well.
So if the 2011 resolution for Corktown residents is to keep an open mind with regard to the homeless, maybe the resolution for St. Peter's should be to comprehend that adding to feelings of embattlement in a struggling neighborhood does not advance the ball in encouraging the fortunate to help the less so. Not everyone in Corktown is a Cooley, but if St. Peter's had played its cards right, the Cooleys might have built Manna its bathrooms.
Bookmarks