Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Results 1 to 10 of 10

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Matty Maroun Sues the City of Detroit

    ]
    Tuesday, May 5, 2009
    Ambassador Bridge owners sue Detroit over fenced property

    Paul Egan / The Detroit News

    Detroit -- The owners of the Ambassador Bridge have filed a lawsuit against the city of Detroit, alleging the city's efforts to remove a security fence from Riverside Park make the bridge susceptible to terrorist attacks.
    The fence in Riverside Park encloses a 150-foot buffer zone around the base of the bridge and improves "the ability of security personnel and law enforcement personnel to guard against persons with malicious intent being able to get too close to the bridge without being observed and counter-measures taken," alleges the suit filed by the Detroit International Bridge Co.
    The city moved the suit to U.S. District Court in Detroit on Tuesday after the bridge owners filed it Monday in Wayne County Circuit Court.
    The city has filed eviction proceedings against the bridge company in Detroit's 36th District Court, alleging it is illegally occupying part of the park between West Jefferson Avenue and a railway crossing.
    "While the city takes the position that the fence was erected without city approval, the city was in close communication with the bridge [[owners) all through the time that the creation of a separate 150-foot zone was being requested and the fence built," the suit brought by the bridge owners alleges. "Moreover, the city has been fully aware of the fence for approximately five years."
    Mayor Kenneth Cockrel, Jr. has said the bridge owners may be willing to buy or swap land with the city to settle the dispute.
    "No matter how big or influential, you must obey the rules," Cockrel told The Detroit News in December.
    pegan@detnews.com [[313) 222-2069

  2. #2

    Default

    time for another ball game?

  3. #3

    Default

    150 foot buffer? Seriously, I wonder where they come up with these silly arbitrary numbers. Security isn't the real reason, Matty just wants that land.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rb336 View Post
    time for another ball game?
    Yes! inside the fence this time.
    Up for May 8th, 9th or 10th?

  5. #5

    Default

    Curious move by the troll.


    This one might work, gotta keep it OUT of the courts...that will be an area where he may have undue influence.

    Should be a curious search to find who he's donated to on the bench during their campaigns. Curious also to see who the McNamara thug-family has endorsed over the years.

    Keep this latest gambit from Maroun's aging empire from succeeding!

    Cheers

  6. #6
    lilpup Guest

    Default

    Is a bit of the park in exchange for MCS and its surrounding property a worthy swap, Matty?

  7. #7
    MIRepublic Guest

    Default

    Curious? This is a galling move. Why won't anyone sue his negligent, greedy, old ass, already? He's bound and determined to do this scatter-shooting. This is a distraction contrived to draw the others breathing down his neck in as many directions as he can.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.