Bachmann Attempts To Connect Swine Flu To Democrats

**Flanders** · May-02-09, 06:08 PM

"I just think that it is an interesting coincidence"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiYYB...eature=related

Yeah, too bad that it first happened during Ford's presidency...

Attachment 965

**gibran** · May-02-09, 06:21 PM

It seems the more thses guys and women speak the sillier they sound

**Flanders** · May-02-09, 06:26 PM

Limbaugh "weighs" in:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz5_QxmMRog

**ejames01** · May-02-09, 08:03 PM

What a POS.

Originally Posted by Flanders

Limbaugh "weighs" in:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz5_QxmMRog

ccbatson · May-02-09, 10:29 PM

Of course, the flu is not "connected" to any person/politician/party...however, the hysteria connected to it certainly could be...most likely liberal media as the root of the amplification of concern.

**vetalalumni** · May-02-09, 11:45 PM

Bachmann and Fox are red herrings. Basically, they are fabricated noise.

ccbatson · May-03-09, 12:07 PM

You don't think the media is central to hysteria on this subject?

**Flanders** · May-04-09, 12:31 PM

Amongst others like Neil Boortz, who are blaming illegal immigrants from Mexico, Michael "Savage" Weiner, a RW radio talkshow host who falsely claims to be an epidemiologist, flips out, calling the Swine Flu virus a possible terrorist manufactured attack planted by Islamic terrorists using illegal immigrants to the US from Mexico

No matter that most, if not all swine flu cases diagnosed in the US so far were found to be the result of US tourists returning from Mexico, or that one of the heros of the conservative corporate capitalists, the suspected virus originator, [[Smithfield Corporation) moved their operations from the US to Mexico due to being repeatedly fined for polluting and unsanitary conditions in their livestock farms.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwHCO_trqhM&NR=1

ccbatson · May-31-09, 11:31 PM

And yet, I have never been wrong...so it isn't narrow minded if it is accurate.

**jcole** · May-31-09, 11:58 PM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

And yet, I have never been wrong...so it isn't narrow minded if it is accurate.

Oh, you must just be a joy to be married to.

**jams** · June-01-09, 12:07 AM

Originally Posted by jcole

Oh, you must just be a joy to be married to.

... or being around.

**rb336** · June-01-09, 07:11 AM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

And yet, I have never been wrong...so it isn't narrow minded if it is accurate.

that is incredibly funny.
god, i pity your "patients"

**Detroitej72** · June-01-09, 08:14 PM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

And yet, I have never been wrong...so it isn't narrow minded if it is accurate.

You are wrong every time you erroneously claim Barney Frank, Fannie and Freddy alone caused the current crisis.

You conveniently leave out that the biggest culprits are deregulation of the banking industry, and free market companies like Country Wide Mortgage, Bear Sterns, etc.

You also fail to point out that Fannie and Freedy are public companies, but I guess to do so, your argument would be rendered false.

**Flanders** · June-02-09, 05:03 PM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

And yet, I have never been wrong...so it isn't narrow minded if it is accurate.

Pretty pathetic, IMO, to pronounce oneself as infallible on of all things, an anonymous internet messageboard...

**Pam** · June-02-09, 05:52 PM

Make it a non-partisan statement by removing the descriptor stupid

Not a partisan descriptor, just an accurate one.

ccbatson · June-01-09, 09:41 PM

They were the most recent guardians of the corruption, not the root...as I have explained many times. Mark Levin spells out the 4 elements of the collapse very succinctly in "Liberty and Tyranny".

**rb336** · June-02-09, 08:18 AM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

They were the most recent guardians of the corruption, not the root...as I have explained many times.

and just as many times we have posted actual conservative economists who say you are wrong

Mark Levin spells out the 4 elements of the collapse very succinctly in "Liberty and Tyranny".

and his economic background is??? oh yeah -- he has none

even real conservatives like david frum dismiss him. he needs to go back to writing sappy books about dogs, as he contributes little more than a slightly more erudite parroting of limbaugh and the rest of the reactionary/neofascist right

ccbatson · June-02-09, 08:03 PM

Be specific....explain one instance where I identified as liberal someone, or something that wasn't.

**Detroitej72** · June-02-09, 08:35 PM

You always seem to put that label on me, for starters.

**jams** · June-03-09, 12:50 AM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

Be specific....explain one instance where I identified as liberal someone, or something that wasn't.

Derisive laughter is not name-calling.

ccbatson · June-03-09, 08:17 PM

And you aren't Detroitej72? Prolife or choice? Pro defense or pacifist? Pro big government or pro individual property rights? For starters.

**Detroitej72** · June-03-09, 10:08 PM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

And you aren't Detroitej72? Prolife or choice? Pro defense or pacifist? Pro big government or pro individual property rights? For starters.

Pro-life, pro defense, with maximum fire power, take prisoners, and subject them to the maximum penalty under the law of the U.S.[[including treaties we signed)

Used to be anti-big government, until the current Republican Recession, now want government to regulate the free market.

That's just for starters.......

**rb336** · June-04-09, 08:19 AM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

And you aren't Detroitej72? Prolife or choice? Pro defense or pacifist? Pro big government or pro individual property rights? For starters.

one false dichotomy after another. typical conservative BS

**mjs** · June-04-09, 10:14 AM

Originally Posted by ccbatson

And you aren't Detroitej72? Prolife or choice? Pro defense or pacifist? Pro big government or pro individual property rights? For starters.

If you were looking for opposites, the more proper question would be imperialist or pacifist. Pro defense is actually closer to pacifism than it is to imperialism. You didn't do to well on your SATs. Did you?

ccbatson · June-04-09, 06:44 PM

DJ used to be conservative, but is now liberal in being pro big government by making a wrong turn in response to republican liberalism. I was right, again and as usual. Any real examples?

False dichotomies? Meaning you think these opposites are not opposite? Do you understand your own thoughts?