I was at a small meeting with the GM's of a local radio and a local television station in 2005. The topic of the city leadership came up and then "the party" was mentioned as an example of the problematic leadership and immaturity. I was astounded and asked directly if it wasn't an urban myth. Both said that it did really happen and they said their newsrooms were jumping that night. Thier news directors were calling them, but could not run stories without party or hospital witnesses and those were not available. Also, neither broadcast station had the resources to put to investigation when the mayor publically denied the episode.
But I cannot believe that Cox was there. He was in the Prosecutor's office and not very well known to the Mayor. What DID probably happen is that Cox started his investigation of the party and when he met with the Mayor privately, the mayor revealed that he knew Cox was a married man having an affair: "I've got a problem and you've got a problem, so let's agree to let this drop..." Then Cox probably realized that he was always going to be vulnerable to his secret , so he revealed it on his own. But he can't reveal that he dropped that investigation that turned out to be so critical - and that's what Yatooma wants. All Cox has to say is that he did indeed short-circuit the investigation and Yatooma will be happy because his case can go forward. But an admission like that will ruin Cox now. It is indeed "gum on his shoe."
Bookmarks