Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Results 1 to 25 of 48

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,040

    Default

    I'm not justifying his actions
    I'm simply stating that he had a valid point and took inappropriate action.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Papasito View Post
    I'm not justifying his actions
    I'm simply stating that he had a valid point and took inappropriate action.

    I think you make a good point. Likewise, I do not approve of his actions. However, his testimony of being railroaded by politicians and the IRS is very sad. Three things come to mind [[assuming his letter is an accurate account of his problems):

    1) There most likely would be no plane crash had he not been continually thrown under the bus by big business and government alike.

    2) Nobody would have ever read his letter had he simply put a gun in his mouth at home. Instead [[and I presume he would consider it a success) millions of people will read his testimonial and decide whether it holds water or not.

    3) How was collateral damage kept to such a minimum seeing he flew a plane into a public building that employs 100+ people?

  3. #3

    Default

    How many hundreds or thousands of people a year, give up, and end their lives quietly over as many issues?
    The fact that this thread is even here to talk about it, is a testament that his agenda was a success.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TKshreve View Post
    I think you make a good point. Likewise, I do not approve of his actions. However, his testimony of being railroaded by politicians and the IRS is very sad. Three things come to mind [[assuming his letter is an accurate account of his problems):

    1) There most likely would be no plane crash had he not been continually thrown under the bus by big business and government alike.

    2) Nobody would have ever read his letter had he simply put a gun in his mouth at home. Instead [[and I presume he would consider it a success) millions of people will read his testimonial and decide whether it holds water or not.

    3) How was collateral damage kept to such a minimum seeing he flew a plane into a public building that employs 100+ people?



    I read that most of the agents were "out in the field" and only a few were inside the building at the time of the crash.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    I read that most of the agents were "out in the field" and only a few were inside the building at the time of the crash.

    Do you think he could have targeted the building at this point and time on purpose?

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TKshreve View Post
    Do you think he could have targeted the building at this point and time on purpose?

    Perhaps, given his state of mind [[or the lack thereof) maybe body counts were not as important to him as destroying a building that was a symbolic physical representation of the IRS, with the potential of recreating on a smaller scale the destruction of the Twin Towers [[international monetary trade) and Pentagon [[military power) 9/11 jet crashes.

  7. #7

    Default

    possible, but if he wanted to do it so no one would get hurt, why not wait until midnight?

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rb336 View Post
    possible, but if he wanted to do it so no one would get hurt, why not wait until midnight?
    Flying at night would cause him to rely more on his instruments and maybe risk hitting something other than his intended target first [[telephone/electrical wires, poles) at that low of an altitude in a very congested area of the city. He struck the seven-story building between the second and third floors to ensure maximum damage to the building, including the resulting fire.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Flying at night would cause him to rely more on his instruments and maybe risk hitting something other than his intended target first [[telephone/electrical wires, poles) at that low of an altitude in a very congested area of the city. He struck the seven-story building between the second and third floors to ensure maximum damage to the building, including the resulting fire.
    There you have it -- he was bent on MAXIMUM damage and didn't give a rat's ass about fatalities, unless he was also planning on maximizing those too

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TKshreve View Post
    Do you think he could have targeted the building at this point and time on purpose?
    Another option would have been a weekend or a Federal holiday.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.