Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 94

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Detroit Rail gets $25 million grant

    http://www.detnews.com/article/20100217/METRO01/2170363/Detroit-light-rail-project-gets-push-from-$25M-federal-grant

    Can someone clarify a question? I thought that the original plan was that the light rail would not be a dedicated line. However, in the picture from the article the light rail is definitely a dedicated line. Have the plan's been modified?

  2. #2

    Default

    Something wrong with your link.

  3. #3

    Default

    try this:

    http://tinyurl.com/ydwcuev

    the woodward light rail line has, from inception, been a dedicated line. you might be confusing it with the AA-DTW-Detroit commuter rail project

  4. #4

    Default

    The photos don't match the article. The News pulled them from DTOGS -- the public plan for light rail on Woodward from downtown to Eight Mile. But the funding announced today is actually going toward M1 rail, the otherwise privately-funded 3.1 mile stretch from downtown to New Center, which, if I'm not mistaken, will be curbside, not in the middle of the road.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    The photos don't match the article. The News pulled them from DTOGS -- the public plan for light rail on Woodward from downtown to Eight Mile. But the funding announced today is actually going toward M1 rail, the otherwise privately-funded 3.1 mile stretch from downtown to New Center, which, if I'm not mistaken, will be curbside, not in the middle of the road.
    The projects haven't officially merged yet? I thought this grant award was contingent upon them merging?

  6. #6

    Default

    The DTOGS plan is now M-1 phase 2

    Don't know how discussion of a woodward light rail could EVER have been about non-dedicated lines, as there are no lines of any kind running up woodward

  7. #7

    Default

    No, I remember from the discussion last year [[and the accompanying article when they released the early photo renderings) that the M1 rail was not going to be a dedicated line.

    I remember the discussion focusing on how the problem would be that the M1 rail would get stuck in traffic and not be that effective.

  8. #8

    Default

    So I still have some trouble finding the official M1-Rail plans on the internet. I find plenty about the now-changed DTOGS plan [[this has about five stops between Jefferson and New Center, while the new plan speaks of 11-13). Can someone direct me to the M1 plans, whether they are preliminary or not? I am curious as to where the planners envision the stations. I think the rail would be vastly more successful if there are more frequent stops, especially between Grand Blvd and Jefferson, than the DTOGS plan. DTOGS had the trains stopping at Grand Circus, MLK, Warren, Piquette, and Grand Blvd. That would leave out plenty of small "micro-districts" that would benefit greatly from a transit stop [[For instance Peterboro-Charlotte, Majestic district, Sugar Hill etc). Can anyone help here?

  9. #9

    Default

    Here's a PDF of the press release on the federal TIGER grants: http://trunc.it/5njqy. Here's what it says about M1 Rail:

    Name: M-1/Woodward Avenue Light Rail Project
    Location: Detroit, MI
    Sponsor: Michigan Department of Transportation
    Total Cost: $143,000,000
    TIGER Funding: $25,000,000

    Highlights:
    - Leverages significant co-investment–almost half of the project’s costs–from local and private sources, including station sponsorship, a development authority and a non-profit foundation
    - Supports economic activity in Detroit, which is an extremely economically distressed area with one of the highest unemployment rates in the country
    - Enhances mobility by intersecting the regional bus system and city bus routes
    - Improves accessibility for disadvantaged populations in the largest city in the United States not currently served by significant rail transit

    Project Description:
    The project will construct a light rail system connecting Downtown Detroit to the New Center district along the region's main artery on Woodward Avenue. The project is 3.4 miles long with 12 station stops. The light rail system will run on both sides of the street in the second lane from the curb and will be co-mingled with vehicular traffic. TIGER funds will be used for road rehabilitation, a streetscape enhancement project, and the purchase of light rail cars.

    Project Benefits:
    The project will have significant short-term benefits for Detroit’s beleaguered economy, including job creation and economic activity. The city also expects the project to provide for significant long-term economic growth in the corridor, while improving mobility on a congested portion of Woodward Avenue, which carries 27,000 vehicles per day, on average. The project is also expected to enhance mobility options in this corridor, and attract investment to Downtown Detroit and the New Center area.

  10. #10

    Default

    I don't like how the light rail will co-mingling with traffic. Isn't this usually for streetcars? At least there's a distinction being made between light rail and the streetcar, as there's money going to a Downtown Dallas Streetcar project.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dtowncitylover View Post
    I don't like how the light rail will co-mingling with traffic. Isn't this usually for streetcars? At least there's a distinction being made between light rail and the streetcar, as there's money going to a Downtown Dallas Streetcar project.
    I think the idea is that the line will utilize light rail cars for the entire route, but south of Grand Boulevard the system will function more like a street car, with more frequent stops along the curb, while north of Grand Boulevard it will take the form of rapid transit, with stops every 1/2 mile or mile and stations in the center lane.

  12. #12

    Default

    If there was light rail, dedicated or not dedicated that was public transportation, I wouldnt care if it was street cars, or light rail or commuter rail or a damn horse an buggy as long as I didnt have to drive would be fine with me. LOL Just get the rails quit fussing about particulars. :-)

  13. #13

    Default

    I'll believe it when I see it.

  14. #14

    Default

    Ever since the private backer's hijacked this plan, I have started feeling worse and worse about the prospects of this project being successful.

    Take for instance how it says the plan started with private funders than evolved into a private public partnership. They omit mentioning DTOGS which as been going on for much longer, yet put a picture of it, a picture of light-rail pulling up to the Warren southbound station in the middle of the street. Maybe it is because DTOGS cared to put time into making detailed pictures and diagrams of the stations. We really don't know what the first phase will even look like. The private investors have a fetish with secrecy and control. And their bud John Hertel has a vendeta against DDOT's plan. Plus, an incredible amount of support came from the state government for the private plan, even though DTOGS was going for years before, so it makes sense what is happening-- whatever the investors dictate.

    I am very worried that when people drive into the city, they see that they can go much faster than the curbside streetcar, which WILL get stuck in traffic, because it is nothing more than a glorified bus, and think this is what the potential of transit is. The densest corridor in the state is served by a glorified bus. I know many have called this People Mover 2.0 but seriously a second people mover would be far superior to this joke. This can NOT be called mass transit. The only way we can call it mass is if there is a dedicated right of way [[aka lane), with traffic signal priority. And that is the minimum. Light-rail is barely mass transit even with these things.

    Kiss goodbye any thoughts real mass transit, at least on the Woodward corridor between New Center and Jefferson.
    Last edited by casscorridor; February-17-10 at 03:01 PM.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by casscorridor View Post
    Kiss goodbye any thoughts real mass transit, at least on the Woodward corridor between New Center and Jefferson.
    Quote Originally Posted by ljbad89 View Post
    I agree completely, Cass.

    Typical Detroit attitude. Talk about shitting on some of the best news to hit the city in a long time. The government literally just gave the project $25 million TODAY and you're already kissing it goodbye because they used the DTOGS drawings instead of the M-1 drawings. Give me a break! At least give this thing a few weeks to fester before writing it off completely. They now have $110 million of their $125 mil goal... Just another push and this thing could be real.

    Not to mention, NO ONE knows how this plan will materialize. It could be more frequent stops in a dedicated lane with signal priority. It could be curbside with signal priority. It could resemble the DTOGs plan. Either way the thing will bring people up and down Woodward without a car. The point is it really doesn't matter if it goes much faster than a car -- it never will. The point is creating activity, density, development and movement in the Woodward corridor. The point is getting people --suburban visitors and urban residents alike-- from the DIA to Comerica Park without having to park downtown, and get them WALKING in between so they stop along the way to spend their money at stores and restaurants.
    Last edited by Gsgeorge; February-17-10 at 04:32 PM.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gsgeorge View Post
    Typical Detroit attitude. Talk about shitting on some of the best news to hit the city in a long time. The government literally just gave the project $25 million TODAY and you're already kissing it goodbye because they used the DTOGS drawings instead of the M-1 drawings. Give me a break! At least give this thing a few weeks to fester before writing it off completely. They now have $110 million of their $125 mil goal... Just another push and this thing could be real.

    Not to mention, NO ONE knows how this plan will materialize. It could be more frequent stops in a dedicated lane with signal priority. It could be curbside with signal priority. It could resemble the DTOGs plan. Either way the thing will bring people up and down Woodward without a car. The point is it really doesn't matter if it goes much faster than a car -- it never will. The point is creating activity, density, development and movement in the Woodward corridor. The point is getting people --suburban visitors and urban residents alike-- from the DIA to Comerica Park without having to park downtown, and get them WALKING in between so they stop along the way to spend their money at stores and restaurants.
    You can do this now. It is called the 53 Woodward and the 16 Dexter. They run fairly frequently 24/7. More frequent during the day and during peak hours, of course.

    The particulars of what is built is very very import, for it will shape the future of transit in Detroit for decades to come.

    If we are making only a modest improvement from what we already have, what will the future of transit look like? Real rapid transit, or a bus with tracks. The reason I am critical is because we are left in the dark months before construction is supposedly slated to start about the particulars of the plan. DTOGS had it very open and transparent. You say that we don't know what will happen, and I agree. So then it is especially important that we are more critical now.

    I am not bashing the 25 million dollars. That is good. But shouldn't it be used for the best plan possible? The article does say "co-mingle with traffic" while also saying that this is a "congested corridor"... which seems like a contradiction, how does this help congestion more than a bus can, unless it has its own right-of-way [[which the article mentions nothing of)? That is what I am asking. We need real mass transit. If a street car style light-rail is built, I am very worried it will stunt the growth of both development in the slated area, as well as future transit growth. This is the only chance we'll get to influence what is built, we have to tell our leaders that what we really want [[even though it is confusing as to who is in charge here, besides the shady investors).

  17. #17

    Default

    I understand that this project is the starting point of mass transit for Detroit. But to be honest I'd rather see a more comprehensive plan than the 3 mile route plus the extension to the New Center area [[that has no funding). I get that this is mostly for citizens in the city without a car, and I definitely see it as a step in the right direction. But I really don't think this is going to make the impact that some people are predicting right away as opposed to when there is light rail running all over. I don't think it really will have much of an impact until there is light rail running up Woodward, Gratiot, Jefferson, Michigan Ave, etc., and not 3 miles. They all need to extend to AT LEAST 8 mile to really bring people into the city. But for all the red tape and political jockeying it's taken to get a 3 mile stretch started, it'll probably take 20 years before these other routes are a reality.

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikeg19 View Post
    I understand that this project is the starting point of mass transit for Detroit. But to be honest I'd rather see a more comprehensive plan than the 3 mile route plus the extension to the New Center area [[that has no funding). I get that this is mostly for citizens in the city without a car, and I definitely see it as a step in the right direction. But I really don't think this is going to make the impact that some people are predicting right away as opposed to when there is light rail running all over. I don't think it really will have much of an impact until there is light rail running up Woodward, Gratiot, Jefferson, Michigan Ave, etc., and not 3 miles. They all need to extend to AT LEAST 8 mile to really bring people into the city. But for all the red tape and political jockeying it's taken to get a 3 mile stretch started, it'll probably take 20 years before these other routes are a reality.
    You're right about this not being a comprehensive plan, but it can be the first part of it and a good example of what could develop if there were a comprehensive plan. For the whole system to be successful, it absolutely NEEDS to be connected to the suburbs. There is no way around it. The line that has the most potential for being connected to the burbs is actually Michigan Ave. Not only does Michigan Ave only travel through Detroit for a scant few miles, but it connects Dearborn with Detroit. Not to mention there are stretches of Michigan Ave in Detroit that have seen a resurgence due to the large Latino population.

    But in terms of profile it is the Woodward Line. Most of the city's main cultural areas lie along Woodward. City leaders need a flagship project, a model for the rest of the system first before they can extend onto Gratiot, Michigan, and Jefferson, which will be important parts of the project in their own ways.

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gsgeorge View Post
    …
    Not to mention, NO ONE knows how this plan will materialize. It could be more frequent stops in a dedicated lane with signal priority. It could be curbside with signal priority. It could resemble the DTOGs plan.
    …
    I’ve always been under the impression that mass transit was for the public. And that mass transit systems should be designed to serve the greater good of everyone. Something about private interest and backroom planning does not seem highly conclusive of these principles.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gsgeorge View Post
    …
    Either way the thing will bring people up and down Woodward without a car. The point is it really doesn't matter if it goes much faster than a car -- it never will. The point is creating activity, density, development and movement in the Woodward corridor.
    …
    Transit’s true value is its efficiency over the car once you’ve created an area full of activity, density and development.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gsgeorge View Post
    The point is getting people --suburban visitors and urban residents alike-- from the DIA to Comerica Park without having to park downtown, and get them WALKING in between so they stop along the way to spend their money at stores and restaurants.
    If your not creating something that actually gives someone an incentive to leave their car at home, their not logically going to drive 90% of the way to ride transit the last 10% of the way unless parking has become somewhat of a scarcity. In that rare situation people will park further north, use it for the single purpose they came down for, return, and drive back to where they came from. People are going to drive to the DIA, then drive to Comerica Park and keep driving everywhere else they want to go because that is their mode of transportation and we’ve spent a lifetime catering to make Detroit the most car accessible city on the planet. This statement is most verifiable when you consider the fact that mass transit planning here in the last 30 years has amounted to little more than parking shuttles.

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by casscorridor View Post
    The only way we can call it mass is if there is a dedicated right of way [[aka lane), with traffic signal priority. And that is the minimum. Light-rail is barely mass transit even with these things.

    Kiss goodbye any thoughts real mass transit, at least on the Woodward corridor between New Center and Jefferson.
    I am virtually certain that the lane will be dedicated to bus and rail only, and that signal priority is part of the plan [[at least in the long term).

    There will be more turning conflicts and conflicts with parking cars than if it was center running, but being on the curb doesn't preclude having a transit only lane. Enforcement will be the big question.

    The advantage of having a curb lane is that transit buses and the rail vehicles can make the same stops, on the right of the vehicles.

  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by casscorridor View Post
    Ever since the private backer's hijacked this plan, I have started feeling worse and worse about the prospects of this project being successful.

    Take for instance how it says the plan started with private funders than evolved into a private public partnership. They omit mentioning DTOGS which as been going on for much longer, yet put a picture of it, a picture of light-rail pulling up to the Warren southbound station in the middle of the street. Maybe it is because DTOGS cared to put time into making detailed pictures and diagrams of the stations. We really don't know what the first phase will even look like. The private investors have a fetish with secrecy and control. And their bud John Hertel has a vendeta against DDOT's plan. Plus, an incredible amount of support came from the state government for the private plan, even though DTOGS was going for years before, so it makes sense what is happening-- whatever the investors dictate.

    I am very worried that when people drive into the city, they see that they can go much faster than the curbside streetcar, which WILL get stuck in traffic, because it is nothing more than a glorified bus, and think this is what the potential of transit is. The densest corridor in the state is served by a glorified bus. I know many have called this People Mover 2.0 but seriously a second people mover would be far superior to this joke. This can NOT be called mass transit. The only way we can call it mass is if there is a dedicated right of way [[aka lane), with traffic signal priority. And that is the minimum. Light-rail is barely mass transit even with these things.

    Kiss goodbye any thoughts real mass transit, at least on the Woodward corridor between New Center and Jefferson.
    If Dave Bing and GM have their way the train probably be more of an inconvenience to passengers they the passengers would want to get back into their cars. If Dave Bing and members of the common council keep kissing GM's a$$ Gm will have the last word on this mass transit in Detroit.

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stasu1213 View Post
    If Dave Bing and GM have their way the train probably be more of an inconvenience to passengers they the passengers would want to get back into their cars. If Dave Bing and members of the common council keep kissing GM's a$$ Gm will have the last word on this mass transit in Detroit.
    GM originally got the ball rolling for the project that has morphed into Ann Arbor to Detroit rail project.

  23. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RO_Resident View Post
    GM originally got the ball rolling for the project that has morphed into Ann Arbor to Detroit rail project.
    I dont trust it. What's in it for GM that their decision would take people away from using cars.

  24. #24

    Default

    In other transit news,

    SEMCOG has put out an RFP [[request for proposal) for bidding on the locomotive and passenger cars for the commuter rail service for Detroit-Ann Arbor and Ann Arbor-Howell [[WALLY). Excuse me if the wording is weird, I don't it get what's going on, just putting it out there for those who don't check SEMCOG often, I assume that this is progress. They still are gung-ho for starting a pilot for the Detroit-Ann Arbor line by October.

  25. #25

    Default

    I agree completely, Cass.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.