There's no reason you can't make the aisles wider.
1. Why wouldn't Detroit have room beneath the streets? There were many propsals for subways back in Detroit's boom times, so I assume the idea was technically feasible.I dont think we have enough room below street level for a subway.If we do then yes a subway would be the cheapest way
2. I didn't say a subway would be cheap [[even the least expensive subway is far more expensive than surface rail), I said it provided better mobility than streetcars and buses, being grade separated. It's hardly relevant now, since the city and state do not have enough money to build a modern light rail system, let alone a subway. My point is that we once did, but chose to develop other means of transportation [[freeways).
Bookmarks