Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Results 1 to 25 of 95

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    “Or give these officers some training, so they know how to treat a child, and maybe a child with a disability, and maybe a child who’s black.”
    My guess is that the cops learned their lesson on how to treat 16 year old Detroiter's when they attended Oak Park Officer Samborskis funeral. Another unarmed 16 year old Detroiter resisting arrest, but apparently that did not stop him from murdering the 28 year old officer.

    http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/story?id...ion=news/state

    I applaud the efforts of these officers for doing their jobs in attempting to apprehend this young man and for attempting CPR after he fell unconscious.
    Last edited by Johnnny5; April-15-09 at 09:18 AM.

  2. #2

    Default

    Lots of stereotypes up there. What indicates the family raised him to resist police, or neglected him? Why should police assume every black teenager is like the one who killed Officer Stamborske?

    The real issue here is why is Tazer not being recognized as a deadly force? This is not the only person who has died from it.

  3. #3

    Default

    wow, some of the comments here are as pathetic as the one's on freep.com, which has long been a bastion for the ignorant to spout off.

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gazhekwe View Post
    Why should police assume every black teenager is like the one who killed Officer Stamborske?
    Black or white it does not make a difference. Samborski's tragic death just reiterated the fact that officers have to assume that every teen willing to break the law is also capable of committing murder. If the young age of these criminals causes them to let their guard down they risk the same fate.

  5. #5

    Default

    I always like to put the shoe on the other foot in these controversies.

    What is every one's opinion on what kind of uproar would have ensued if a five foot kid from Warren was pursued from Detroit to his home in Warren and tasered to death there? Somehow I think it would be an even bigger story.

    I also think there is too little known, until a full investigation is finished, to pass judgment on anyone, police, parents or civilians, at this time.

  6. #6

    Default

    Any person may be capable of committing murder. All they need is a gun or knife that can be concealed on their person. Officers should never let down their guard. The Tazer needs scrutiny. Should it be the first thing the officer reaches for when confronting a fleeing or resistant person? Should the officers have to consider the relative size of the person? Small, no Tazer? Grown men have died after being physically restrained, no Tazer. I have seen two healthy young men who died after being restrained according to professionally trained methods. No one intended them any harm, but they needed to be restrained to protect themselves and others. There are risks with any method, we just need to make sure they are being responsibly addressed. The tragedy of anyone's death is a wake-up call. How can we prevent this from happening again?

  7. #7

    Default

    i havent looked up the stats in a while but something like 340 people have died from being tasered by police since the forces started using them..running from the police should not be a death sentance..its like all the deaths that happen from high speed police chases. My belief is let them go because most will reoffend another day and there will be another chance to catch them without loss of life

  8. #8

    Default

    My belief is let them go because most will re offend another day and there will be another chance to catch them without loss of life.
    ???
    Or another car chase, after another offense against people or property. Finish what's started, until other non-lethal ways are found to stop and subdue offenders.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigb23 View Post
    ???
    Or another car chase, after another offense against people or property. Finish what's started, until other non-lethal ways are found to stop and subdue offenders.
    car chases put innocent bystanders at great risk..its stupid for the police to give chase and put citizens lives at risk for failure to stop at a stop sign or something like it, and many times these criminals don’t even have anything in the car other than a dime bag of some weed. Its the criminals fault for running and not following police orders but in cases of petty crimes loss of life is not justifiable. Now of course there are exceptions to be made for hard core offenses but most of the time it appears to be petty crime resulting in deadly force..I am just saying that these criminals will reoffend and eventually be caught i wouldn’t want anyone to die for a petty offense even if that offense was committed against me or mine

  10. #10

    Default

    I stand by the police. What is it about "STOP - POLICE" that some people don't understand? Black, white, arab, native american, pink, orange or polka-dotted...when the police say stop...STOP! I do not believe in the "let them go for another day" theory. Next time it might be a worse crime where the person is running after committing a murder or assault.

    I'm sorry this young person died...but he should have STOPPED. He should not have run from the police. He may have been charged with a minor crime, but he would still be alive. I would rather have the police using a tazer than a gun. If the tazer misses its target no one gets injured. If a gun missed its target some innocent person could die. In most cases the tazer is not lethal. Yes, there are exceptions...but again...if you STOP when you are told to, there is NO RISK.

  11. #11

    Default

    A sad, tragic story. A young man is dead. The tazer [[sp?), which is intended to reduce deadly force, is not always safe.....but far more humane and less likely to harm bystanders than a gun.
    Investigations will be done, and we can then reach judgments on what went wrong, but two things are evident:
    The victim should not have run, or resisted.
    The police officers appear to have done nothing against policy.
    I support the police, and ask that parents begin teaching their children respect for the police and themselves. When a cop says "stop", you stop!

  12. #12

    Default

    In all the articles about this case it clearly states that the boy had some type of learning disability. It never says he was a criminal or a thug or raised improperly or neglected. I do not doubt that the police did not intend to end this boy's life. I do believe they were trying to do their jobs effectively. They probably had no way to know that he had a learning disability. It is not fair to make assumptions about the police or the boy since all we know is that he ran away from the cops when no one, even his his family, knows why he ran away from the cops.

  13. #13

    Default

    Tasers are more humane than a bullet, but whenever you shoot an electrical volt at somebody you never know how the heart is going to handle it. Some people even teenagers have enlarged hearts or otherwise questionable systems that may not be able to handle to taser shock. More study may need to be done on this "non-lethal" weapon

  14. #14
    crawford Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iheartbooks View Post
    In all the articles about this case it clearly states that the boy had some type of learning disability.
    A learning disability just means Special Ed. Probably half of African American boys in DPS are categorized as learning disabled. It doesn't mean he's severly mentally handicapped or anything.

    I also wonder if people have been to South Warren lately. There seems to an underlying sentiment of "racist, white" Warren, but the city south of the freeway is very mixed racially these days. I wouldn't be surprised if there were Warren Census Tracts south of 9 Mile that were majority black nowadays.

    I don't see much difference between the Warren side and the Detroit side of 8 Mile. They're pretty similar nowadays.

  15. #15

    Default

    The intent of the taser is to subdue the assailant, not to kill. It is meant as a non-lethal way to apprehend. It is not meant to kill. Sad, in two cases in Michigan it is the end result of teens being tasered and ultimately killed. But I do not believe the officers involved wanted this boy dead. If they didn't have the taser and they used fist strikes and headlocks to subdue him, after he broke the law, fled, and physically resisted arrest the outcome of a racists would be the same. They used a taser, which subdues the assailant just enough to restrain him. It's maybe the taser company that should be looked at, not the cops. The cops were just doing their job. It is not easy being a cop these days I'm sure.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Single Malt View Post
    It's maybe the taser company that should be looked at, not the cops. The cops were just doing their job.
    Even the mayor of Warren is calling for an independent investigation so it's not known whether the police acted appropriately at this point.

  17. #17

    Default

    wow, some of the comments here are as pathetic as the one's on freep.com, which has long been a bastion for the ignorant to spout off.
    So what is it that irks you so much posted above? Please enlighten us where the ignorant are spouting off. Or do you prefer to look and judge with no direct account.

    Do we not have a smiley that has the guy shooting himself in the head?


    The intent of the taser is to subdue the assailant, not to kill.
    Why on earth did they need to subdue the 16 year old? Why?

    Oh, that's right, he ran from the cops.If people would stop supporting the "Burgular tripped on my son's rollerskate" mentality, maybe we could get something going right in this country. But instead I'll sue you and you sue me, and let's tape it red and never hear the end of it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.