Michigan Central Restored and Opening
RESTORED MICHIGAN CENTRAL DEPOT OPENS »



Results 1 to 24 of 24

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fury13 View Post
    Have 13 districts, with one council member from each district; no at-large members. The council should elect its own president and vice-president.

    Districts could be something like this:

    1 - CBD
    2 - Near West Side and Corktown
    3 - Southwest Detroit and Delray
    4 - Near Northwest and Middle Grand River Corridor
    5 - Far Northwest
    6 - Warrendale and Far West
    7 - North End
    8 - Sherwood Forest, Palmer Woods, Green Acres
    9 - Near East Side, Lafayette Park
    10 - Near Northeast and Middle Gratiot Corridor, City Airport area
    11 - Far North and Northeast
    12 - Indian Village to Jefferson East
    13 - East English Village, Morningside, Balduck Park area

    This way, all areas get represented.
    Fury13, I agree that there do not need to be at-large members. While I am not completely opposed to the idea, I think that having legislative body members represent a district-based constituency has many benefits.

    At any rate, one factor that will need to be considered is the population of whatever districts are created. Since the 1964 Supreme Court decision in Reynolds v. Sims, "one person, one vote" is required in apportioning electoral districts. Therefore, at least at the time the districts are initially drawn up, the populations of each district will need to be nearly the same. Then, the districts would need to be redrawn every 10 years based on census data. As a result, I think the best that will practically happen is to do the districts roughly by geography, and then play with the district lines to account for population.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cman710 View Post
    .......Since the 1964 Supreme Court decision in Reynolds v. Sims, "one person, one vote" is required in apportioning electoral districts. Therefore, at least at the time the districts are initially drawn up, the populations of each district will need to be nearly the same. Then, the districts would need to be redrawn every 10 years based on census data. As a result, I think the best that will practically happen is to do the districts roughly by geography, and then play with the district lines to account for population.
    You know, that's an excellent point. Anyone know of a link to a population map of Detroit?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.