Actually, if you would've listened to the full PW presentation tonight, the reason that the Packard Plant was on the list was to acknowledge the fact that sometimes, even in the preservation community, we must admit when something is "too far gone". It was on the list for context, and to admit that if a building isn't made stable & secure, it'll end up as the next Packard Plant.
It's better to listen to the presentation reason instead of relying on a soundbyte.
[[PQZ, please ease up on the personal attacks. It's not contributing anything constructive or civil to the discussion)
Bookmarks