Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 36 of 36
  1. #26
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Mixed economies vasilate between failure [[socialism) and prosperity [[capitalism)...look around. Europe pulling back from extreme misery via socialism, and Obama leading the US to the same cliff.

  2. #27

    Default

    That's "vacilate", BTW. Spellcheck is a wonderful tool; you should avail yourself of it now and then.

  3. #28
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Nice try, spelling is off folks...never mind that the idea is dead on. Cheap attempt.

  4. #29

    Default

    Just trying to help, Cc. Just trying to help.
    As for your idea...the Roman empire was a "mixed" economy [[remember "bread and circuses"?) and survived for some 1,200 years. So your history is off, as well as your spelling.

  5. #30
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Survived...then fell, not prosperous and growing as capitalism would have in perpetuity if properly practiced.

  6. #31

    Default

    Survived for 1200 years, then succumbed to the soldiers of the 4th Crusade.
    I doubt that even capitalism would have survived in perpetuity with a broadsword through its head.

    So the empire didn't fall because it was mixed economy, would not have continued had it been a purely capitalist economy, and your premise is still fatally flawed.

  7. #32
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Capitalism would produce, as it has for the US, a military/defense structure that would protect that government from any and all potential invaders.

    Come on Elganned, you are better than that last argument, you must try a bit harder next time.

  8. #33

    Default

    Your assertion was that mixed economies fail because they are mixed while pure capitalistic economies endure perpetually.

    The example refuted your assertion, and by your own statements "pure" capitalism has never existed and so can't provide any examples for comparison.

    Fail.

  9. #34
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    That is the theory and history is proving it. We have a mixed economy, when it swings socialist, failures ensue and are progressive. When things gravitate towards capitalism, growth and prosperity follow.

  10. #35

    Default

    I guess that's why we experienced our most prosperous years under the "socialist" programs of the New Deal and after Ronnie "gravitated" us towards more "capitalism" have experienced the worst economic calamity since the Great Depression. That bears out your theory.

    Oh, wait...uh, never mind.

  11. #36
    ccbatson Guest

    Default

    Prosperous under socialism? an Oxymoron and internally inconsistent. Marx would deem prosperity as a failure of socialism.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.