I have been trying to find an email I sent to the council several years ago regarding the future of MCS, but can't locate it. The only member to reply was the current mayor, and he & I had a nice email conversation about it. [[To be fair, Watson's email address wasn't working. Funny, the only member I knew personally & I couldn't even contact her!)
Essentially I outlined the importance of MCS to Detroit and what it could be. Once demolished it will be gone forever, and today another beautiful and grand structure would never be built. The best we could get would be a generic glass building that could go anywhere.
Examining the usage of other older stations, they no longer tend to be viable for only rail service. What would be the harm in making it a transit center, which would be the hub for both Amtrak & Greyhound? This wouldn't be enough to make it a viable use, but with additional restaurants and shopping it could work. Detroit has talked for years about needing a mall of its own and what would be better than remodeling the office tower into retail usage with a movie theater? This sort of conversion has been done before, and there is plenty of vacant land surrounding MCS for parking structures.
Detroit is a CITY and should look to other major cities to see what has worked to make them viable rather than use the suburban model of strip malls & parking lots. It's one thing to have Washington's Union Station in use, but other cities have realized what their older rail stations are worth also. Are we really less of a world-class city than Kansas City? They saved their Union Station and it is beautiful. As it has been pointed out, people are attracted to MCS even though there is nothing there but a monument to Mouron's policy of not giving a damn. To me, this could be the nexus of a successful Detroit.
I am very depressed right now.
Bookmarks