Yea it's a point, a small one, but still a point. I think it's a complete farce of a point because the courts clearly sided with Green Dot with the overnight fence.
With restaurants going back as far as they have been on that property, my best is the courts side with Green Dot because of 1. imminent domain because of how long a restaurant has been on that property and 2. where are these property lines from, the DIBC or the city? My bet is they are two different maps.
Bookmarks