If every politician running for office that claimed to be there for the people actually did what they said in the last 50 years,we would not have the inner cities that we do.
In the case of Talib,$140,000 private donations verses $480,000 in corporation donations.
Which is the exact opposite of what it reads in her profile in the justicedemocrates link.
Insurance and medical companies are the largest donors.
Granted her platform is making corporations pay the way but how is it one uses that stance of working for the people against the injustices of the evil corporations while useing them to fund your platform?
She would not have been able to run a campaign without the corporation sponsor's and the corporations would not have handed her the knife to cut thier legs off if they believed that it was truly her intent to do so.
So believing true intent of a candidate comes into question.
They are just like everybody else with career goals,some will do and say anything including stepping on others in order to achieve that goal.
Tell me what you want to hear so I can capitalize on it and look like I am serving in your best interests.
The current president was not funded by a majority of corporations but yet seems to have little love on that aspect,so the concept of evil corporation funding is a no no seems to have little relevance.
A 2010 securities and exchange ruling bars financial institution executives from donating to presidential campaigns,Goldman Sachs actually sent an email to its employees telling them not to donate to the Trump/Pence campaign,but the employees still donated $3500.
What they did do for Hillary was pay her $280,000 for a speaking engagement.
Bookmarks