This is meaningless. The only more populous countries are China and India, so obviously the U.S. will have the most immigrants. The U.S. accepts roughly half the immigrants of our competitor nations [[proportionally). We should obviously be compared to Germany, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, not dirt-poor third world countries.
Most European countries are comparatively poor. The rich European countries have much higher rates of immigration than the U.S. Yes, obviously the U.S. has more immigrants than Hungary, Albania or Portugal.
Well, duh. China is poor and Japan is dying.
The opposite is true. As the U.S. share of immigration has fallen, the U.S. economy has fallen. As Canada, Australia and Germany added more immigrants [[who otherwise would have gone to U.S.) those countries have risen.
Technology creates far more jobs than it destroys. We have a worker shortage.
Immigrants have lower birthrates in the U.S. than in their former countries, so that makes no sense. If you care about "dwindling resources and rapidly warming planet" you would want as many immigrants as possible in the U.S., where affluence drives down nativity.
Bookmarks