A point of the article, and the point I'm trying to make, is that you're presenting a false dichotomy.
Your false dichotomy: You either have to own a car or walk through a blizzard with a baby.
Reality:
There are a variety of options that prevent the "baby in a blizzard" scenario:
- Don't go out in the blizzard [[probably the best option)
- Reschedule appointments
- Utilize ride sharing
- Have groceries delivered [[this cuts into the savings of not having a car, but you still come out ahead)
- Have a friend or relative help you if you're in a bind
Yesterday we had a blizzard. My wife stayed home with the kids. She didn't drive anywhere and I took the AWD Honda CR-V to the bus stop in Troy. In the past we've canceled and rescheduled appointments due to bad weather even though we have two cars. Managing risk to ourselves and cars causes us to make some of the same decisions to not go out into the blizzard with the baby, even with an AWD car.
There are lots of options. Having one car for every adult is an option. So is having less than one car per adult. I'm not saying that you have to use my option, nor do I have to use yours. But I think the possibilities are exciting for my future if I end up being a stay at home parent. My job as a stay at home parent would be maintaining the household and maximizing financial efficiency. Going down to a one car household is an efficiency we could gain and the savings could be utilized elsewhere.
Bookmarks