Belanger Park River Rouge
NFL DRAFT THONGS DOWNTOWN DETROIT »



Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 154

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default 2018 Detroit Tigers

    The official DetroitYES thread for discussion of the 2018 Detroit Tigers.

    .................................................. ..............................................

    "The round-top Old English ‘D’ — a version that has been worn on the left breast nearly every season since the mid-1930s — will be replaced with the team’s primary logo beginning this season, the Tigers announced on Thursday morning."

    https://www.freep.com/story/sports/m...ms/1063791001/




  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zads07 View Post
    https://www.freep.com/story/sports/m...ms/1063791001/

    "The round-top Old English ‘D’ — a version that has been worn on the left breast nearly every season since the mid-1930s — will be replaced with the team’s primary logo beginning this season, the Tigers announced on Thursday morning."
    Thus undoing one of the greatest and longest-standing uniform 'quirks' in American sports: the disparity between the "cap D" and the "jersey D" that has been part of Detroit Tiger uniforms going back into the mists of baseball history [[or at least since the '30s). Someone in the new management must have some unbearable OCD or something.

    Interestingly, they've chosen the newer of the 2. The current cap "D" goes back to 1963 [[earlier versions had a rounded top, a bit more similar to the jersey D). The current jersey "D" goes back to 1908 [[the Tigers started using the "D" in a simpler form in 1904) and was used on and off until it became permanent in 1934.

    Of course, the Tigers' use of the Olde English letter style was pretty clearly swiped from the masthead of the Detroit Free Press, which had used that typeface [[with a rounded "D" similar to the jersey version) going back into the 1830s.

    So why change something that ain't really broken? What's wrong with the Tigers certainly won't be fixed by changing the uniforms.
    Last edited by EastsideAl; January-26-18 at 01:43 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EastsideAl View Post
    Thus undoing one of the greatest and longest-standing uniform 'quirks' in American sports: the disparity between the "cap D" and the "jersey D" that has been part of Detroit Tiger uniforms going back into the mists of baseball history [[or at least since the '30s). Someone in the new management must have some unbearable OCD or something.

    Interestingly, they've chosen the newer of the 2. The current cap "D" goes back to 1963 [[earlier versions had a rounded top, a bit more similar to the jersey D). The current jersey "D" goes back to 1908 [[the Tigers started using the "D" in a simpler form in 1904) and was used on and off until it became permanent in 1934.

    Of course, the Tigers' use of the Olde English letter style was pretty clearly swiped from the masthead of the Detroit Free Press, which had used that typeface [[with a rounded "D" similar to the jersey version) going back into the 1830s.

    So why change something that ain't really broken? What's wrong with the Tigers certainly won't be fixed by changing the uniforms.
    What am I supposed to do with this jacket now?
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by emu steve View Post
    What am I supposed to do with this jacket now?
    Continue to wear it. The Pistons went back to their logo from the Bad Boys era this season, and I have a sweatsuit that has the previous logos on it. I'm wearing it until either it doesn't fit any more or it somehow gets damaged. Authentic team clothing can be pricey to purchase for such a minor change.
    Last edited by Cincinnati_Kid; February-06-18 at 01:48 AM.

  5. #5

    Default

    Minor twitching. No big deal. Meanwhile, Vegas sports books have them at 150-1 to win the World Series in 2018. I'd make it more like 1000-1, but that's just me.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ray1936 View Post
    Minor twitching. No big deal. Meanwhile, Vegas sports books have them at 150-1 to win the World Series in 2018. I'd make it more like 1000-1, but that's just me.
    Not minor. This is a big change to the uniform that has been nearly the main logo since the inception of the club. This is messing with perfection and there is immense fan backlash that this club will regret making this move.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zads07 View Post
    Not minor. This is a big change to the uniform that has been nearly the main logo since the inception of the club. This is messing with perfection and there is immense fan backlash that this club will regret making this move.
    You do have to wonder why they would take any chance on alienating fans even further at a time when their on-field product is so remarkably awful.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EastsideAl View Post
    You do have to wonder why they would take any chance on alienating fans even further at a time when their on-field product is so remarkably awful.


    Let's Fire Ernie Harwell while we're at it.

  9. #9

    Default

    I don't think this had to be done. I think the club was in need of some news headlines going in to the spring and this was really just all they could come up with.

    This was the better option of the two to keep though. The brand has been leaning this way for a long time. It would have cost millions to retrofit Comerica Park to the other version of the D. Hell as I look at CoPa and the new parking structures at this moment, I can count at least 30 D's, and that is just from a Woodward vantage point.

  10. #10

    Default

    A better problem to have than having a forced name change underfoot, i.e.: Indians, Redskins. Unless of course a buncha old englishmen somewhere complained about cultural misappropriation of their alphabet!?

  11. #11

    Default

    This is unnecessary and frankly stupid. I have no confidence in the morons currently running the Tigers at any level. This team is going to suck for a long, long time. All those trades that yielded "prospects" in exchange for star players might turn into a few average major leaguers at best. There are no future stars in this bunch.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drjeff View Post
    This is unnecessary and frankly stupid. I have no confidence in the morons currently running the Tigers at any level. This team is going to suck for a long, long time. All those trades that yielded "prospects" in exchange for star players might turn into a few average major leaguers at best. There are no future stars in this bunch.
    Who exactly are the star players the Tigers traded? Stars are guys like Altuve, Lindor, Judge, Harper, Stanton, Trout, Machado, etc. Every one of those guys was a prospect on their team before becoming a star. I guess the Tigers should have kept 35 yr. old Ian Kinsler and his .235 batting average or paid JD Martinez 25 million per year for his below avg. defense. Why hasn't he received a contract anywhere? Maybe they should have forced Verlander to stick around at 28 million a year even though he said he wanted no part of a rebuild? Had we kept those guys with our current pitching we would be lucky to play .500. This team should have been broken up two years earlier but, understandably, Mike Ilitch wanted one last shot before he passed even though I'm certain he knew it was a long shot. The Tigers tried to build a championship through free agency twice in the last 12 years and came close but without a core of young players from their farm system they came up short. I guess you want Chris Ilitch to spend 300 million on payroll. The team has a core of 4-5 starting pitching prospects to provide a foundation and now must develop some everyday players by trading for prospects. Candelario looks like a solid player at 3rd and Daz Cameron in center. Paredes may be a good middle infielder. They need a couple more everyday players, one or two of whom are stars. NO TEAM is giving up their top prospects in trades anymore. Then they can dip into free agency. This is and always has been the only way to build a team. So please, quit whining!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 401don View Post
    Who exactly are the star players the Tigers traded? Stars are guys like Altuve, Lindor, Judge, Harper, Stanton, Trout, Machado, etc. Every one of those guys was a prospect on their team before becoming a star. I guess the Tigers should have kept 35 yr. old Ian Kinsler and his .235 batting average or paid JD Martinez 25 million per year for his below avg. defense. Why hasn't he received a contract anywhere? Maybe they should have forced Verlander to stick around at 28 million a year even though he said he wanted no part of a rebuild? Had we kept those guys with our current pitching we would be lucky to play .500. This team should have been broken up two years earlier but, understandably, Mike Ilitch wanted one last shot before he passed even though I'm certain he knew it was a long shot. The Tigers tried to build a championship through free agency twice in the last 12 years and came close but without a core of young players from their farm system they came up short. I guess you want Chris Ilitch to spend 300 million on payroll. The team has a core of 4-5 starting pitching prospects to provide a foundation and now must develop some everyday players by trading for prospects. Candelario looks like a solid player at 3rd and Daz Cameron in center. Paredes may be a good middle infielder. They need a couple more everyday players, one or two of whom are stars. NO TEAM is giving up their top prospects in trades anymore. Then they can dip into free agency. This is and always has been the only way to build a team. So please, quit whining!
    If I'm following MLB correctly this is what I see:

    The market [[price for free agents) has gotten too expensive.

    The 'remedy': Develop your own and control them at very sweet salary levels.

    Eventually this market will even out where the price [[salary) for FAs will become more reasonable and teams will begin bidding on them.

    What does Judge make? How much would he make if he were a FA and could command an open-market salary.

    And yes, teams like Detroit, Miami, Pittsburgh, etc. aren't doing anything to keep FA competition going.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by emu steve View Post
    I
    What does Judge make? How much would he make if he were a FA and could command an open-market salary.
    Judge made 507k last year. A terrific bargain by MLB standards.

    On the open market, I don't know, $25 million/yr? He has only one year of stats and is a strikeout king, but is also one of the most fearsome bashers in baseball.

    But I doubt the NYY will ever let him hit free agency.

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 401don View Post
    Who exactly are the star players the Tigers traded? Stars are guys like Altuve, Lindor, Judge, Harper, Stanton, Trout, Machado, etc. Every one of those guys was a prospect on their team before becoming a star. I guess the Tigers should have kept 35 yr. old Ian Kinsler and his .235 batting average or paid JD Martinez 25 million per year for his below avg. defense. Why hasn't he received a contract anywhere? Maybe they should have forced Verlander to stick around at 28 million a year even though he said he wanted no part of a rebuild? Had we kept those guys with our current pitching we would be lucky to play .500. This team should have been broken up two years earlier but, understandably, Mike Ilitch wanted one last shot before he passed even though I'm certain he knew it was a long shot. The Tigers tried to build a championship through free agency twice in the last 12 years and came close but without a core of young players from their farm system they came up short. I guess you want Chris Ilitch to spend 300 million on payroll.
    When Casey Stengel was managing the Yankees, he said, better to trade a guy a year early than to trade him a year late."

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 401don View Post
    Who exactly are the star players the Tigers traded? Stars are guys like Altuve, Lindor, Judge, Harper, Stanton, Trout, Machado, etc. Every one of those guys was a prospect on their team before becoming a star. I guess the Tigers should have kept 35 yr. old Ian Kinsler and his .235 batting average or paid JD Martinez 25 million per year for his below avg. defense. Why hasn't he received a contract anywhere? Maybe they should have forced Verlander to stick around at 28 million a year even though he said he wanted no part of a rebuild? Had we kept those guys with our current pitching we would be lucky to play .500. This team should have been broken up two years earlier but, understandably, Mike Ilitch wanted one last shot before he passed even though I'm certain he knew it was a long shot. The Tigers tried to build a championship through free agency twice in the last 12 years and came close but without a core of young players from their farm system they came up short. I guess you want Chris Ilitch to spend 300 million on payroll. The team has a core of 4-5 starting pitching prospects to provide a foundation and now must develop some everyday players by trading for prospects. Candelario looks like a solid player at 3rd and Daz Cameron in center. Paredes may be a good middle infielder. They need a couple more everyday players, one or two of whom are stars. NO TEAM is giving up their top prospects in trades anymore. Then they can dip into free agency. This is and always has been the only way to build a team. So please, quit whining!
    You have no idea what you're talking about. Just because a player is in the minors does not make him a top prospect. The stars you named, everyone knew would be good. The minor leaguers we got in trades, based on their records to date, might become average major leaguers at best. This is why I'm angry about it. Management traded several all star players and got average in return. The system as a whole still sucks, the drafting has not yielded much of value, and players in the system who were touted as "future stars" have not turned into anything more than average. Average does not win.

    I've been a season ticket holder for 20 years and watch nearly every game I'm not attending on TV. I coached baseball. The Tigers system right now is terrible. Frankly I don't care if Verlander "didn't want to play for a rebuilding team." He was under contract, is a future hall of famer, and should have been a Tigers for life. The 2018 Tigers will probably lose 110 games and it will be years before they contend again.

    /end rant

  17. #17

  18. #18

    Default

    For the cup-half-full crowd, what miracles would it take for the Tigers to defy the odds and, say, make the playoffs?

    A palimony-besieged Miggy to have an MVP season? A last hurrah comeback-of-the-year award for Victor? The surprise sensational rise of a Jeimar Candedlario or Dixon Machado? Shane Greene becoming a premier closer? All of the above? And more?

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lowell View Post
    For the cup-half-full crowd, what miracles would it take for the Tigers to defy the odds and, say, make the playoffs?

    A palimony-besieged Miggy to have an MVP season? A last hurrah comeback-of-the-year award for Victor? The surprise sensational rise of a Jeimar Candedlario or Dixon Machado? Shane Greene becoming a premier closer? All of the above? And more?
    At least it was clearly validated it was not a back-ache, but a palimony head-ache which contributed to the total downfall.......

  20. #20

    Default

    Am I the only person who likes this move? I've always liked the pointy D better; I think it looks classier.
    At any rate this is a minor tweak. The real issue is the product on the field is going to stink for at least 2 or 3 years.

  21. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KJ5 View Post
    Am I the only person who likes this move? I've always liked the pointy D better; I think it looks classier.
    At any rate this is a minor tweak. The real issue is the product on the field is going to stink for at least 2 or 3 years.
    You’re not the only one; I much prefer the “pointy” D.

  22. #22

    Default

    Merchandise money grab?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zads07 View Post
    https://www.freep.com/story/sports/m...ms/1063791001/

    "The round-top Old English ‘D’ — a version that has been worn on the left breast nearly every season since the mid-1930s — will be replaced with the team’s primary logo beginning this season, the Tigers announced on Thursday morning."


    What concerns me if that the Tigers will be replacing seats at Comerica with butts in them to seats without [[butts in them).

    Tickets are now on sale and plenty of Opening Day tickets are available.

    Hmmmmmmmmm.

    Catholics believe in purgatory, a place where one spends time for their sins. Well 2018 [[2019? 2020?) will be purgatory for Tigers' fans and the Tigers' CFO [[and vendors, etc. etc.).

    Ticket sales might plummet in 2018. I'll guess at least 500K compared to last year.

    Someone once told me, 'no free lunches on Wall Street.' Well 2018 isn't going to be a nice, free lunch for the Tigers.

    It will be ugly [[even though the team might not be as bad as I previously thought).

  24. #24

    Default

    Tigers aren't the only team making changes.

    http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/2...-logo-uniforms

  25. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cincinnati_Kid View Post
    Tigers aren't the only team making changes.

    http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/2...-logo-uniforms
    Ah, me. The snowflakes win again.

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Instagram
BEST ONLINE FORUM FOR
DETROIT-BASED DISCUSSION
DetroitYES Awarded BEST OF DETROIT 2015 - Detroit MetroTimes - Best Online Forum for Detroit-based Discussion 2015

ENJOY DETROITYES?


AND HAVE ADS REMOVED DETAILS »





Welcome to DetroitYES! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
DetroitYES! is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to DetroitYES! [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.