Welcome to Dem Land

**jcole** · September-30-19, 08:49 AM

Originally Posted by Zacha341

Ehh, is Ms. Clinton gearing up to run?

Mrs Clinton and Chelsea just wrote a book about "Gutsy Women" and are on the publicity trail right now. Doesn't signify a run.

**Richard** · September-29-19, 06:39 PM

^ Trump earned 306 Electoral College votes in 2016 to Clinton's 232. But Clinton, who won the popular vote, still argues against his legitimacy as a president since she earned around 3 million more votes than him.

Even she does not understand that the presidency is not won on the popular vote,or she does but thinks her based is that stupid not to have figured it out yet.

**Zacha341** · September-30-19, 05:15 AM

^^^ Hah! Had Trump won by the Popular vote the Electoral would be championed as the best option!

**Zacha341** · September-30-19, 09:26 AM

Yeah I was half funning...

... She'd not win anyway.

There's enough women that don't care for her [[even despite Trump).

Good look with the book!

**oladub** · September-30-19, 10:33 AM

Originally Posted by Zacha341

Yeah I was half funning...

... She'd not win anyway.

There's enough women that don't care for her [[even despite Trump).

Good look with the book!

If the Democratic national convention winds up hopelessly deadlocked, Hillary could offer her services. It's a long shot but, like Romney and summer bugs, Hillary has been showing up in spotlights lately.

**jcole** · September-30-19, 06:22 PM

Originally Posted by Zacha341

Yeah I was half funning...

... She'd not win anyway.

There's enough women that don't care for her [[even despite Trump).

Good look with the book!

Well, I'm a woman and I like her...I think her time to run for the presidency is over, but as a strong woman with brains and guts, I like her

**Zacha341** · September-30-19, 08:08 PM

^^^ I am a woman. I admire and know many women who are smart and strong. I did not, and would not vote for Hillary Clinton.

**Richard** · October-04-19, 12:55 PM

AOC town hall meeting.

Climate change woman says,we need to eat the babies.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=HULW-ODeqLg

And they say Trump supporters are deplorable?

**Canadian Visitor** · October-04-19, 01:06 PM

Originally Posted by Richard

AOC town hall meeting.

Climate change woman says,we need to eat the babies.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=HULW-ODeqLg

And they say Trump supporters are deplorable?

And how do you know she's isn't a Trump supporter? Could be a plant!

[[I'd love to let this one sit and see how long it takes Richard to realize......but I can't.....LOL........) We don't all wear tin foil hats.

**oladub** · October-04-19, 01:43 PM

Originally Posted by Canadian Visitor

And how do you know she's isn't a Trump supporter? Could be a plant!

[[I'd love to let this one sit and see how long it takes Richard to realize......but I can't.....LOL........) We don't all wear tin foil hats.

I agree. She could be a plant although she would be easier to track down than the anonymous whistleblower's "anonymous sources" but not weirder than the abortion doctor who stored a thousand aborted embryos in his garage or Democratic politicians who promote 3rd. trimester abortions. Tulsi Gabbard is the only Democratic Presidential candidate who has expressed any interest at maintaining the Roe vs. Wade status quo.

**Richard** · October-04-19, 02:00 PM

Originally Posted by Canadian Visitor

And how do you know she's isn't a Trump supporter? Could be a plant!

[[I'd love to let this one sit and see how long it takes Richard to realize......but I can't.....LOL........) We don't all wear tin foil hats.

Lol ya it was the economics Larouche PAC trolling AOC.

I guess with the wako stuff AOC comes up with they figured she would fit right in.

**aj3647** · October-04-19, 02:18 PM

Originally Posted by Richard

AOC town hall meeting.

Climate change woman says,we need to eat the babies.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=HULW-ODeqLg

And they say Trump supporters are deplorable?

Well, since the woman was a Trump supporter who was planted there by Far Right Lyndon LaRouche cultists to create a fake news narrative...yes, she's a Deplorable. Maybe you should wait for the facts to pan out first before you spout off at the mouth with claims that later turn out to be bogus.

Fake news...and you were the first one to swallow it.

**oladub** · October-04-19, 04:05 PM

Originally Posted by aj3647

Well, since the woman was a Trump supporter who was planted there by Far Right Lyndon LaRouche cultists to create a fake news narrative...yes, she's a Deplorable. Maybe you should wait for the facts to pan out first before you spout off at the mouth with claims that later turn out to be bogus.

Far right? I looked up the LaRouche movement. If anything, the LaRouche movement has historically leaned left with ties to the Labor Party, a history of fielding Democratic candidates, and globalist tendencies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaRouche_movement

**Dan Wesson** · October-06-19, 08:32 AM

Originally Posted by oladub

Far right? I looked up the LaRouche movement. If anything, the LaRouche movement has historically leaned left with ties to the Labor Party, a history of fielding Democratic candidates, and globalist tendencies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaRouche_movement

Apparently ol' Lyndon came to see the error of his ways...

**aj3647** · October-07-19, 08:23 AM

Originally Posted by oladub

Far right? I looked up the LaRouche movement. If anything, the LaRouche movement has historically leaned left with ties to the Labor Party, a history of fielding Democratic candidates, and globalist tendencies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaRouche_movement

Never stop being you, oladub.

https://www.salon.com/2019/10/05/tru...-fringe-group/

LaRouche himself died earlier this year at 96. He had run for president eight times between 1976 and 2004. He had “built a worldwide following based on conspiracy theories, economic doom, anti-Semitism, homophobia and racism,” The Washington Post reported after his death. Though LaRouche's early views were more aligned with the left, his ideology later became “ultraconservative and apocalyptic,” according to the Post. Prior to his death, the group expressed support for Trump.

**oladub** · October-07-19, 10:55 AM

Originally Posted by aj3647

Never stop being you, oladub.

https://www.salon.com/2019/10/05/tru...-fringe-group/

aj, Thank you for the Salon fake news article. The last sentence you linked to reads "Prior to his death, the group expressed support for Trump.

Maybe the LaRouche organization did change directions and support Trump. However, going to your link, the thin proof is that two LaRouche supporters "outside the Cos Cob post Office" supported Trump rather than the organization supporting Trump. The actions of two people at the Cos Cob post office hardly supports Salon's claim about the position of the LaRouche organization. Remember that I was responding to your previous post 702 in which you claimed "Well, since the woman was a Trump supporter who was planted there by Far Right Lyndon LaRouche cultists to create a fake news narrative...yes, she's a Deplorable." Nice of you to consider people who don't agree with you as "deplorable". Arrogance worked so well for for establishing where Hillary was coming from too. To claim that the LaRouche movement was "far right" based on three people, even assuming that to be true, does not weigh more than the more neutral wikipedia take I cited mentioning the long history of LaRouche Democratic candidates, its ties with the even more leftist Labor Party, and globalist tendencies. I can excerpt quotes if you wish. Maybe there are some LaRouche people running as Republicans you can point to to better make your point.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaRouche_movement

Nice to have you back aj but with Democrats spinning another coup and Halloween approaching, your return isn't a surprise. Too bad your last coup attempt turned out to be such a nothing burger based on allegations invented by foreign sources financed by the Hillary campaign and laundered by Democrats through federal government agencies. It wasn't even good enough for the Robert Swan Mueller III show. Maybe your luck will change.

**Richard** · October-04-19, 01:46 PM

Here is what happens when the republican tax plan is passed off as a Bernie plan

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-33SQ_2fEoc

**Richard** · October-04-19, 03:03 PM

^ lol that’s rich,wait for the facts first.

Kinda like claiming Russian collusion and whistleblowers hiding under the bed?

How come I am held to a higher standard then the Dems?

I guess you missed my 2nd post,I knew the facts before I posted,I just wanted to see who got triggered.I knew you would be.

**Zacha341** · October-04-19, 06:27 PM

^^^ Exactly and withstanding where the video was posted the content the videod remains. Conveying a sadness and despair that's the larger issue [[going on in this particular woman's mind/ psyche). What a hurting woman -- beyond the cause she is stating there's a deeper pain. AOC, just staring at her, is actually too shallow to really see.

What's worse the speaker will not be able to CONTROL the birth rates of groups and communities who per their views on family will not abide to 'eat' their children. They will bring forth their children as an expression of the other choice and option.

The message of this video is for those already not interested in children; and they should not have them if they do not want to.

**Richard** · October-04-19, 06:45 PM

^ she was just acting,it’s about the whole green deal with the move everybody to urban cores and population control in countries that cannot afford to feed thier people,1 child per family everywhere else in order to reduce the carbon footprint.

Acting insane to show how insane some of the stuff they are seriously considering.

You cannot really eat your babies because meat would also be banned.

**Zacha341** · October-06-19, 08:42 AM

AOC did not even challenge her... just that stare. Whatever.

Maybe they mean Soylent Green conversion. More over 'eat your babies' is a metaphor perhaps. I can see that.

Originally Posted by Richard

...Acting insane to show how insane some of the stuff they are seriously considering.

You cannot really eat your babies because meat would also be banned.

**Richard** · October-06-19, 09:43 AM

Originally Posted by Zacha341

AOC did not even challenge her... just that stare. Whatever.

Maybe they mean Soylent Green conversion. More over 'eat your babies' is a metaphor perhaps. I can see that.

The problem with that whole radical progressive group is they want to try all of these social experiments that most have all ready proven that it is the bottom half that gets the short end of the stick and ends up eating out of the dumpster.

**Richard** · October-06-19, 09:40 AM

Originally Posted by Dan Wesson

Apparently ol' Lyndon came to see the error of his ways...

yea kinda like the tea party did,”they” do not like it when others try and buck the system.

Kinda like what is happening now,kinda like the song... one way or another,we going to get ya.

**Zacha341** · October-06-19, 09:57 AM

Yep, the people at the top usually stay at the top!

**bust** · October-06-19, 12:53 PM

Haha, those who push Venezuela and Cuba as examples of what progressive democrats are aiming for think we're too lazy to question that. And sure enough, there are plenty whose confirmation bias, from having forever been fed that BS, make them willing to swallow the kool-aid without a second thought. Chavez, Maduro, and Castro are/were dictators, obviously.

Wonder why they never cite countries like Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Great Britain, Japan, Norway, Canada, the Netherlands, Ireland, New Zealand, Australia, Belgium, Austria, or Switzerland instead.

Is the bottom half in any of those countries eating from dumpsters? Compared to all of them we have a far greater imbalance of wealth. They do a much better job keeping the playing field level and ensuring a fair shot at a minimum quality of life for people not so fortunate as to belong to the upper class.

We can do better, and so can you.