They do overall, historically. We don't see the same generational welfare outcomes. This in part could be due to leveraging strong family networks.
For certain living on welfare is precarious, and needs to be a turnstyle as such, and the funding not infinite. And as funds must be spread further the 'satisfaction' factor is fading. As is the tax-payer base.
Precisely! By jettisoning the man from the households [[to qualify for welfare benefits) the welfare state [[ergo replacing the head of the household) for example, helped destroy the black nuclear family.
The stronger the intact family, the stronger the opportunity for upward mobility!
Bookmarks