Based on the renderings, many aspects of this design make good sense.
One problem with the Hudsons site is that it's very deep. This design solves that problem by having an atrium in the center of the block, with other circulation spaces [[the gaps you can see from the street) coming off of it. The atrium also aides in navigating the various program elements [[you can look up the atrium and see where you need to get), and an atrium is a more pleasant circulation experience than the standard bank of elevators.
The gaps also seem to correspond to the various programs, making them legible. This also aides in navigation.
The office section being divided that way is also useful for leasing to tenants. It looks like there's basically three office buildings above the rest, each articulated. So a company could lease one of the entire "buildings", instead of being just one tenant buried on floor #5-6 or whatever.
The gaps on the facade also break down the scale of the facade to something more comparable to the surrounding buildings. But it does this without being completely contrived or artificial. It makes sense to break up the massing in that way, and the facades of each section relate to the function of the spaces behind it. This is in contrast to many buildings which have a large number of facade types covering up uniform office space behind it.
imo the swoops and bends and whatnot don't really have much architectural basis and are there for flash/wow/branding/PR. I'm not personally a fan of that kind of capitalist or commercialized spectacle. But Gilbert certainly is, since it has been the core of the designwork in many of his properties. It doesn't mean that everything has to be orthogonal or that there can never be visual interest or spatial richness, but imo it should be more principled and should evolve naturally and be integrated with other design considerations. There's really no reason for the apartment tower to be so bent.
I do like that the tower is slender. The sad state of downtown allowed us to almost entirely dodge the overscaled mega fat office behemoth skyscrapers from the 70s onwards. One Detroit Center is much thicker than its neighboring buildings, but it's thinner than it could have been and the overall proportions help it. Detroit is slightly more like European cities where the skyscrapers have always been smaller scale. The McNamara Federal Building is our primary chunky tower.
Bookmarks