It is exceptionally clear that he has read them. Your comment makes it abundantly clear that you either a) did not read them or b) lack the intellect to comprehend what you read.
The conclusions in the article aren't supported by the links they themselves reference.
As an example,.. they state in the article that,..
" United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship. "
But if you bother to open the link,.. the case doesn't say that at all. Instead it says this,... [[The conclusion at the very end)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/169/649/
The court ordered Wong Kim Ark to be discharged, upon the ground that he was a citizen of the United States. 1 Fed.Rep. 382. The United States appealed to this court, and the appellee was admitted to bail pending the appeal.
Notice it says the court concluded that Wong Kim Ark was a CITIZEN,.. and never declares him a Natural Born Citizen.
You can't just read the headlines.
And the Harvard Law Review is just a newspaper written by students,.. it's not a court of law. And that last link is just silly. A phony Fact Check by an anonymous writer at the Socialist rag USA today. Hardly a source of news, let alone a court of law.
This is a matter for the courts to decide.
That said,.. it's not an issue at the moment. Sen Harris is a dream opponent for anyone.
But this sort of thing DOES need to be decided at some point. It's come up a lot lately.
Last edited by Bigdd; August-15-20 at 09:34 PM.
|
Bookmarks